27 Feb
2014
27 Feb
'14
3:21 p.m.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
The problem is, prototype and jQuery both share the
same $ global variable.
How do we deal with it?
AFAIK, Bootstrap does not depends on $, but use the window.jQuery global
variable. Of course, Bootstrap is not an AMD module, you may use it with
requirejs with the shim feature. Since, we already use jQuery with
require.js, I do not see any problem to make them work side-by-side with
prototype.
We can probably improve our performance by benefiting of jQuery and
Bootstrap CDN distribution, with a local fallback. Here is a possible
configuration:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/13498856/537790
Thanks,
2014-02-26 18:57 GMT+01:00 Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu>lu>:
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Caleb James
DeLisle <cjd(a)hyperboria.ca
we
wrote:
Overall I'm generally in favor of migrating
away from prototype but I
don't
know what this vote is about.
This vote is about deprecating prototype.js in favor of jQuery.
It means developing any new feature using jQuery and put all the effort can in migrating existing features to jQuery
until the point we can vote
the removal of prototype.js, and put it aside, as an possible extension.
>
> Will we still be including prototype in every page load? Will it still
be
> bound to the $ variable? If so then loading
jquery for a small widget
is
a
for
performance issue.
If the vote were to change prototype from holding the $ global variable
and
> only load it on demand (requirejs) and refactor all of our code to deal
> with
> it, I'd be in favor of this even though it will break backward compat > the
> user. If we're not willing to (ever) break backward compat then talking
> about
> jquery is silly, we're a prototype shop, that's just our fate.
>
> This vote looks like a sort of non-binding resolution in favor of
jquery
> and
> disfavor of prototype so for that I'll give a non-binding +1.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Caleb
>
>
> On 02/26/2014 02:15 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org>
> wrote:
> >> +1 (both the vote and Marius' suggestions)
> >>
> >
> >> But we also need to decide on an OOP framework for jQuery, if we
still
> >> want to write OOP widgets instead
of some raw function hell.
> >
> > +1, otherwise it will be harder to migrate the current object
oriented
> > code written in Prototype.js .
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marius
> >
> >>
> >> On 02/25/2014 05:34 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
> >>> I would add that we should use it with require.js and that we
should
> >>> make sure the jQuery plugins we
pick integrate with require.js
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Marius
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
> >>> <mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> >>>> +1, most of the mainstream JavaScript frameworks (Angular, Ember,
> >>>> Backbone) integrate very well with jQuery so we shouldn't have
any
> >>>> problem picking one of these JavaScript frameworks later.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Marius
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
> >>>> <valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi devs,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This has been brought into discussion several times so this
thread
is
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>>> intended for this particular topic.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Caty
>
> --
> Sergiu Dumitriu
> http://purl.org/net/sergiu
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs