4 Apr
2017
4 Apr
'17
1:08 p.m.
My vision is that in the future we will have more Flavors supported, not
just the KB one.
I'm sure we would want to have at least one more flavor for Development,
for example.
So what will be the strategy? will we provide packaging for all the
"support" Flavors? The argument would be the same, having the jetty package
will be easier to use and test on it.
Thanks,
Caty
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
propose. The
goal of the flavor is not stop maintaining packagings but to
offer various content
It's possible you are mixing stuff here. I'm not talking about stop
providing any jetty/hsqldb package, you would have the XWiki one on
which you are asked which flavor you want. I'm only talking about a
special Knowledge Base one.
simplest to
get started with XWiki.
--
Thomas Mortagne
Hi Thomas,
> On 4 Apr 2017, at 11:48, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
Hi dev,
The title say it all.
The whole point of Knowledge Base flavor move is to stop maintaining a
set of install packages and only provide the flavor.
For me there’s a difference between the flavor and the packaging we Now it could be a pain for testers to have to
install the flavor every
time so we might still release a jetty/hsqldb package but not list it
on http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download for example.
WDYT ?
This packaging is one of the most widely used because it’s one of the
See the green share on http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/
bin/temp/space/page/chart/1795539013.png
So I think we should definitely keep it.
Thanks
-Vincent
>
> I would prefer to avoid that but I can understand if others think it's
required.
Thanks,
--
Thomas Mortagne