2 Dec
2008
2 Dec
'08
10:02 p.m.
The little I look into it from a user perspective... it looks horribly
windowsish...
I find both Ext controls (at least as in Curriki) or GWT controls much
less tainted.
Among little difficulties, scroll-wheel (that is, MacBook's two-finger-
trackpad) isn't working.
Maybe I'm old fashion but I still don't understand what is the
interest of providing the API documentation only using a doc-browser
which prevents most self-organization one is used to (e.g. open in a
new tab, bookmark, put in history). Both SmartClient and Ext do this
mistake.
(I've never seen a desktop javadoc reader which has really beaten the
web-based ones)
paul
Le 02-déc.-08 à 19:02, Vincent Massol a écrit :
Hi,
I'd like to propose using smartGWT/smartClient for all our widget
needs both in GWT and in JS:
* Their set is pretty impressive and has all we need.
* It's under LGPL
* Sanjiv has moved from Ext GWT to SmartGWT and since he's had a bad
history with Ext GWT we can assume he has received enough reassurance
from smartClient to remain open source and under the LGPL license.
* It's both GWT and JS and we need both
* The little of the source I have seen look very clean.
Some links:
* http://www.jroller.com/sjivan/entry/smartgwt_1_0_released
* http://code.google.com/p/smartgwt/
* http://www.ongwt.com/post/2008/11/27/SmartGWT-%3A-A-
QampA-with-Sanjiv-Jivan2
* http://www.smartclient.com/product/smartLGPL.jsp
Here's my +1 (barring any issue we see when we start using it of
course)
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs