16 Dec
2010
16 Dec
'10
12:04 p.m.
On Dec 16, 2010, at 11:56 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
Not sure what we are talking about, but can't we
use
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Include+Macro
with context=current?
That's a bit different since context=new creates a new context (context=current
doesn't do anything).
or make the {{current}} macro a new parameters for the
{{include}} ?
Yes i thought about adding a new param to the include macro but that won't solve the
the second use case listed below.
We could have both though: a param for include + that macro for other use cases.
However Thomas raised a good question which we need to answer before we go further.
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Caty
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:51, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:42, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> I'd like to propose a new macro (not sure how to call it): {{current}}
>>
>> Usage:
>>
>> {{current document="wiki:space.page"}}
>> .... nested blocks....
>> {{/current}}
>>
>> What it does:
>>
>> * Execute the nested blocks in the context of the passed document, i.e.
> it sets the passed document as the current document in the execution
> context.
>
> So that means "current" macro will execute itself the transformations
> for its content ? What would be the priority of "current" macro in
> this case ?
>
>>
>> Rationale:
>>
>> * We have several use cases:
>> ** When we have an include and we want to use relative references (links,
> images) in the included document
>> ** On the Features page of enterprise.xwiki.org I query
> extensions.xwiki.org and get the data from one object field which has the
> format: "attach:...." (or "url:....", etc). I need to make this
an image
> that is resolved based on the page where the information was taken from.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent