8 Oct
2013
8 Oct
'13
7:25 p.m.
Le 8 oct. 2013 18:42, "Sergiu Dumitriu" <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> a écrit :
OK, I see, I misread the initial proposal. I thought it could be
something that can package any kind of distribution on top of the XWiki
platform, not just something based on XE.
+1 for including the -enterprise- part in the name, although I still
slightly prefer to add another part in there, but I'm not sure "product"
is right anymore.
Maybe xwiki-enterprise-derivate-archetype? -downstream-? -repackaging-?
xwiki-enterprise-custom-archetype ?
xwiki-enterprise-xe-archetype ?
On 10/08/2013 12:25 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> I think there is a misunderstanding due the the first mail that was
> not very clear.
>
> What Vincent did here is not something that creates XWiki
> distributions (for example XE), it's something that create XE
> distributions (something that inherits XE).
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
>> On 10/08/2013 11:15 AM, Vincent Massol
wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/08/2013 10:58 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 8, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/07/2013 11:23 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to add an archetype module in xwiki-enterprise
so that
users can easily extend XE to create their own distributions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It'll generate a multimodule project with *-web, *-ui,
*-data and
*-distribution modules (and possibly installers in a second version).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I remember some users asking for this (e.g. Fabio) and I
have the
need myself now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1, but the name should be more generic, like
>>>>>
>>>>> you mean less generic, not more :)
>>>>
>>>> No, I mean more generic. xwiki-enterprise is too specific, it means
>>>> exactly the XWiki Enterprise product.
>>>>
>>>>>> xwiki-distribution-archetype, because that's what it builds,
custom
>>>>>> distributions built on top of XWiki, not enterprises for XWiki.
>>>>>
>>>>> I chose voluntarily to not have
xwiki-enterprise-distribution-archetype because it doesn't build
distributions. It generates all modules to build a product based on XE.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Right, "product" is the right term. I used
"distribution" as a
synonym
>>>> of "product" (like a Linux
distro) not with the "packaging/installer"
>>>> sense that's used in the actual XE modules.
>>>>
>>>> So, +1 for xwiki-product-archetype.
>>>
>>> Except that all modules in enterprise start with xwiki-enterprise so
that would be xwiki-enterprise-product-archetype and I believe it's
overkill since there's only 1 archetype ATM.
>>>
>>> If everyone thinks that xwiki-enterprise-product-archetype is better
than xwiki-enterprise-archetype, I'll change it.
>
> Should that really be a module of xwiki-enterprise? To me it looks like
> a tool, which could have been used to create xwiki-enterprise itself.
>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs