8 Oct
2009
8 Oct
'09
2:16 p.m.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 13:43, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Oct 7, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
This is exactly what is sandbox, do you see any
applications/plugins/etc. folders ?
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:02, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
I really don't like the idea of a repository of top level projects for
contrib projects. I think I'd be -1 for having that. Same as we don't
have a repo of top level sandbox project and a repo of top level
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
contrib is a repository of top level projects not a project itself IMO On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 20:37, Jerome Velociter
<jerome(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>> Note: It's important to write somewhere clearly that Xlet projects
>> are
>> not done by the xwiki dev team and not supported by the xwiki dev
>> team
>> (and thus that the quality depends on the contributor(s)).
>>
>> It could also be mentioned that at some point an Xlet project
>> could be
>> elected to become a platform project if the interest is generic,
>> if
>> it's voted and if the quality is good enough.
>
> I agree. I think the best place for that would be a page on
> code.xwiki.org.
>
> I don't think we need a new wiki for the forge (except technically
> - for
> SVN), I would be to aggregate all info that concern contrib in
> code.xwiki.org since they are closely related.
>
> BTW I forgot to mention in the original email, I think we should
> propose
> a generic maven groupId for individuals or projects that don't want
> to
> come up with their own. Something like "org.xwiki.contrib".
all projects are supposed to have at least a name and generally can
use org.xwiki.myproject I think
The current rule is org.xwiki.<top level project> so if contrib is a
top level project it seems logical to have org.xwiki.contrib. platform projects.
As I said the way it's organized between plugins and applications
currently is wrong IMO.
Also note that with your arguments there is no reason to have
enterprise and manager top projects, all their sub projects should be
extracted and organized by type instead of project.
It would also break our top level project rule which is that projects
at http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/ are top level projects and have
associated jira/wiki/etc.
However as I mentioned I'm for being able to graduate from the contrib
project to the platform project or even to a top level project if we
want it, but on a case by case basis.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne