17 Sep
2010
17 Sep
'10
8:47 p.m.
I prefer "columns" to "columnGroup"
But perhaps that's the pom.xml living in the programmer talking here...
Jerome.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Anca Luca <lucaa(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi all,
On 09/17/2010 04:21 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
Hi Anca,
There were some concerns over the name "section" - name that I
shamelessly ripped from confluence when working on that - see
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2963
I'm not such a big fan of section either.
I would go for
columnGroup
, I think layout is a bit too general, it must be obvious it's about
columns since it actually enforces the column macro inside.
The other proposals were:
columns -- too easy to mistake for column
layout -- too general in my view
What do others think?
Thanks,
Anca
Besides that, +1
Jerome.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Anca Luca<lucaa(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hi devs,
wdyt about committing the section& macro columns from the contrib
(https://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/projects/xwiki-macro-column/)
in the platform macros, along with a first, very simple implementation
of the dashboard macro (which for the moment only delegates to the
section macro)?
This would be the first step towards the implementation of the
dashboard, and the plan is to be done before 2.5M2.
Here's my +1.
WDYT?
Anca
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs