+1
Thanks,
Thibaut
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On 02/11/2011 10:33 AM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:17, Vincent
Massol<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Thanks for your feedback on my previous mail on this topic. I've
discussed
> it more with Gregory and Emilie and
here's what we'd like to propose
now:
>
> * Add a Profesional Services heading on the download which would contain
> ** Some text explaining about community support and linking to
>
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support (which already
describes
> community support)
> ** A livetable containing companies offering professional services for
> XWiki. The columns would be:
> *** Logo
> *** Company name
> *** Number of active committers
> *** Link to the correct anchor on the Support page (
>
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support)
> ** The livetable would only show 3 entries
> ** The livetable would be sorted by active committers by default
> ** A text that explains how to add a new company to the list and which
> would point to the Governance page (
>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance)
>
> * We will remove the current XWiki SAS support link since that
information
> will be moved to the livetable
>
> * Rework the download page so that when a download link is clicked, it
> opens a new page containing the feedback questionnaire while the
download
> happens
> ** Note that for this to be technically possible I propose to remove the
> link to the OW2 mirrors and instead link to the only existing mirror
(OW2
> seems to have only 1...). If not, we would
need some code to compute
which
> OW2 mirror to use based on the location.
>
> * The feedback questionnaire page would contain the following:
> ** The following questionnaire:
>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/SatisfactionSurveyProducts(let… the
questions together)
> ** The questionnaire would start with a first
question asking to which
> companies it should be sent to. We would list all companies offering
> professional support (using checkboxes) with a special text for the top
one
> ("Top contributor") and in
parenthesis listing the number of active
> committers. For example:
>
> [ ] XWiki SAS - Top contributor with 15 active committers
> [ ] Softec - 1 active committer
>
> ** A text explaining that it's optional and what the questionnaire will
be
> used for, i.e. that
> *** it will be published anonymously on
xwiki.org to improve the
product
> *** it will be sent to the companies for
which the user has checked the
box
>
>
> We've tried to design this proposal with taking 2 ideas into account:
> 1) that it's fair and that all companies can have a fair visibility
> 2) that it's visible which companies contribute the most (to reward
their
contributions)
WDYT?
That seems to me really fair, and you have my big +1 !
Thanks,
+1 too.
Thanks,
Marius
Denis
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> On Jan 10, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
>> Hi devs and everyone,
>>
>> Emilie has proposed the following content to be added to the Download
> page (
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download):
>>
>>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/TextDownload
>>
>> The idea is twofold:
>> 1) to get feedback about what people think about our software.
>> 2) some people who download the XWiki software from
xwiki.org don't
know
> that XWiki SAS has a commercial offerings and
could be interested by it
>>
>> The pros for the community are:
>> 1) XWiki SAS will publish back the result of the feedback it receives
> from the download form which will allow us to fine tune and improve the
> software
>> 2) XWiki SAS could get more business (from people who want to buy
> support, dev work, hosting, etc) which will mean accrued budget for
paying
> developers and resources to work on the XWiki
project
>>
>> Note 1: the form would be of course optional
>> Note 2: in the future I'd like to see a not for profit foundation to
> handle
xwiki.org, the xwiki open source project, donations, etc. When
this
> happens we could elect from member for the
foundation and have the
feedback
form sent
to that foundation for example, with members of the foundation
having access to the data (for example).
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent Massol, acting as both CTO of XWiki SAS and XWiki open source
developer
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs