2 Nov
2010
2 Nov
'10
3:54 p.m.
+1 as long as it's marked experimental.
For the future, when the syntax is stable, what migration path do we
offer ? An option to automatically migrate all 2.0 content to 2.1 ?
Also when changing syntax in the panel, should we provide specific
migrators to migrate a page from 1.0 directly to 2.1 like we do from
2.0 to 2.1 ? from 2.0 to 2.1 ? (this one probably is not needed)
Jerome.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to include xwiki/2.1 in the list of available syntaxes by default for
2.6RC1.
Of course the default syntax remains xwiki/2.0.
The rationale is:
* Get people to know it exist and try it out as early as possible to provide feedback
Note that it's marked (experimental) in the syntax combo box list so it should be
enough to let people know about its status.
Here's my +1
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs