22 Apr
2010
22 Apr
'10
5:53 p.m.
On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
+0 for the release
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:06, Caleb James DeLisle <calebdelisle(a)lavabit.com
+1 for more branches :)
You do realize that +1 means you're going to have to do the work of maintaining them
yourself, right (maybe with Caleb since he also wants to do that + anyone who want to do
it) ? :)
Maintaining =
* merge changes to them
* test them
* release them
I'm certainly -1 to force any dev to do that, we already have way too much work and
too little manpower. It's already taxing to support 2 branches.
However we don't have any rule for preventing anyone to maintain branches though so
there's nothing to change IMO. You can already maintain as many as you want.
Which branches would you like to commit to support yourself?
Thanks
-Vincent
wrote:
+1 we
shouldn't delay more IMO since we're already a bit late compared to
the
roadmap and we also have 3 branches to support ATM which is harder than
it could be ;)
I like the idea of supporting more than 2 branches. Of course this isn't
the place to discuss that.