On 2 Mar 2015 at 10:34:03, Marius Dumitru Florea
(mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com(mailto:mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com)) wrote:
I had forgotten about this vote. I'm not against
using a special
'system' user, but as Denis pointed out, we also have to think about
how this will be displayed in the UI (including localization). Until
we have this I'm -0.
Don’t forget that we’re already using that for all xclasses initialized by java code.
I don’t see why “superadmin” is not a good display name for now (till we introduce another
System user).
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Marius
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Of course, I still agree with the above vote, but I think we should also
> improve the display of the superadmin user, currently it does not have any
> display name, and IMO it will look odd to have more and more pages created
> and authored by "superadmin". I have actually not a clear idea about the
> right name, but it should be self explanatory, and superadmin is not in my
> opinion. I remember we talk about "System", which is a bit better, but we
> may still find something better. "XWiki System",... please make cleverer
> proposal :)
> WDYT ?
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:56 AM, vincent(a)massol.net
> wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> We already had a VOTE about this in the past (
>>
http://markmail.org/message/p5cvswxtrnm54i3m) where we agreed to use the
>> superadmin user.
>>
>> I see it’s been done only for xclass pages created by XWiki so far.
>>
>> According to the VOTE we should also do that for pages imported by the
>> packager plugin too.
>>
>> See also the comments at
>>
>>
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/commit/5d5020052983d1a4de255104f8a8…
>>
>> I hope devs still agree about that vote :) And for those who didn’t VOTE
>> at the time, please reply to this mail.
>>
>> Note: I don’t find it normal that the packager plugin would use the Admin
>> user since it’s a user that isn’t necessarily present in the wiki whereas
>> the superadmin always is.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>