12 Jun
2008
12 Jun
'08
10:06 a.m.
On Jun 12, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Fabio Mancinelli wrote:
On 12 juin 08, at 08:01, Vincent Massol wrote:
To use it:
* Use the component manager to look up the parser: role =
org.xwiki.rendering.Parser, hint = xwiki/2.0 (that's xwiki 2.0 syntax
btw but that's going to be the new syntax real soon and is very
similar to the 1.0 syntax - main change are the macros).
* Call parser.parse(String contentToParse). You get back a XDOM object
which is an in memory DOM of the parsed content which contains Block
(see org.xwiki.rendering.block package).
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi Malaka,
Don't you need a xwiki syntax parser for this?
As you probably know I have written such a parser in the new
rendering module. Just make you don't reinvent one.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Jun 12, 2008, at 6:05 AM, malaka ekanayake wrote:
> Hi fabio
> Regarding the xwiki syntax I have some questions. Up to now its
> straightforward to implement the highlighting for syntaxes like
> *bold*.
> *bold* can be easily identified by a "MultiLineRule" as a single
> partition.
> But it is possible for someone to write a *bold~~bold
> &italics~~bold*.Right ?.
> So this can go on and on.How should I tackle this problem.
> I think *bold~~bold &italics~~bold* should generate 3 partitions
> because partitions are non overlapping.
> *bold
> ~~bold &italics~~
> bold*
> Is this right ?.
> Should I look into this problem later and implement the sample
> plugin
> for simple syntaxes like *bild*,~~italics~~ or not ? .
>
Hi all,
Yes. By definition a partition is not overlapping, so if styles can
be composed generating a "compound style" such as bold-italic, this
should be in the context of a new partition type.
For the parser Vincent has mentioned... It would be good to use it
as the "foundation".
The idea is to use this parser as the "partitioner" where partitions
are the terminal symbols of the underlying grammar.
However, I guess we should check the compatibility of the Eclipse-
way of doing such a kind of things (that seems to me more regex-
oriented) vs the classical way using a lexer-parser.
You might explore a little bit this solution, looking at Vincent's
parser.
I avail myself of this mail for saying that there is an intern at
XWiki, Venkatesh Nandakumar, that is working on a XWiki semantic
editor, that apparently has some overlap with your work. Venkatesh
has already written some Eclipse-oriented syntax-highlighting code.
Since I am not aware of what has been done, Venkatesh should present
what he did to the list, so that we can minimize the efforts and
avoid duplicate work.
For what concerns your work, I suggest the following steps:
1) Try to finish a first version of the plugin with "compound style"
partitioning. This is good for gaining a better understanding of the
Eclipse text framework.
2) Take a look at Vincent's parser and try to understand if it's
easy/feasible to use it as the partion-source (I'll look at this
issue as well).
3) Wait for Venkatesh to tell us what he has done so that we can all
synchronize.
Cheers,
Fabio