). They used bold because they have a basic/poor design.
What is interesting at Google Suggest is that they highlight the
additionally suggested text (you type "xw", it suggests "xwiki
platform" and
highlights the "iki platform" so that the next character you type wipes out
it's suggestion. I think this is smart and I would like to see a proposal (2
versions: one with bold and the other with italic) based on this example.
Raluca.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Jerome Velociter <jerome(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Ecaterina Moraru
(Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 19:24, Jean-Vincent Drean
<jean-vincent(a)drean.org
wrote:
1A. looks better imho.
I don't think is fair that you show us just the tags use case.
If we were to use bold for Part2, things get complicated.
I don't think it look that bad with bold on item description
highlighting :
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/SuggestRedesignPro…
The highlighting in item description in part 2 is a marginal case
anyway (most of the times the description will not be matching).
I'm not strongly against proposition B but I think it does not look so
good.
Jerome.
We are using bold just to emphase titles, so I think italics 1B are
enough,
because the main localization is done by
.highlightColor, even though our
default yellow is not that readable (but we can improve this).
+1 1B
Thanks,
Caty
> Thanks,
> JV.
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Jerome Velociter <jerome(a)xwiki.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello again,
> >
> > Following my previous email, here is a first draft proposition about
> > the visual redesign of the suggest widget.
> >
> > Currently the widget style is pretty off the colibri skin. A bit
> > better with toucan, but not really ideal either.
> >
> > I propose we move to a simpler, lighter design, that make uses of
> > Color Themes. You can find a first proposal with two variants (that
> > you can test live) on the incubator :
> >
> >
>
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/SuggestRedesignPro…
>
> Note that this mail concerns only the first part of the document for
> now : suggest with items without description (items with description
> are not supported yet, I'll propose them later on).
>
> Let me know what you think, and if you agree with the overall
> direction. Then we can discuss the tiny bits.
>
> Jerome.
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org