On 11 Jul 2017, at 15:28, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yes we discussed these things before in :
[Vote] Showcase contributors in the Release Notes
http://markmail.org/thread/2fb7vjnzegmpsg43
[Proposal] Extend the ack section of the Release Notes
http://markmail.org/thread/pj6jvaepk5sl3pag
ah yes that’s it. It was this second thread that I was remembering! :)
Ok so I/we just need to implement it and make it part of the release process.
The problem was that it's kind of hard to not
forget someone. We also have
translators on l10n.
The QA team could add themselves when they test the release (since usually
they test after the release and also they switch the attribution).
Yes I thought about this too. Let’s try to automate first and then if it comes short we
can use a manual step.
Note that using resolution = fixed, will hide the case when a reporter reports a jira and
we close it in another jira, marking the reported issue as “duplicate”.
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Caty
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We’ve been having 3 persons in the community who help test XWiki every day
> and who report jira issues: Ilie, Gabriela and Manuel. Manuel has been
> doing this over 4 years now (close to 5 actually)!
>
> They’re important and they help XWiki get better every day and release
> over release.
>
> I think we should recognize them more in the project.
>
> I have 2 ideas:
> * Mention this role of QA engineer on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/
> bin/view/Community/HallOfFame and make it more “official"
> * Make them visible in the RN. Right now in the RN we mention everyone who
> contributed code. I think we could also mention everyone who created a JIRA
> issue that got fixed during that release.
>
> WDYT? Any other idea?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> PS: I forgot if I already sent a mail on this topic or not (couldn’t find
> one but it vaguely rings a bell). Anyone remembers? :)
>
>