6 May
2013
6 May
'13
10:44 a.m.
On May 6, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Ok so your proposal was to do it after each release (not just final releases). I think
it's quite some work so I'd propose that we start by doing it all the time for
RC1 releases and then if it works out nicely and we can tune the upgrade process so that
it's fast then we could try to do it more, including milestones (but sometimes
milestones are not that stable but I agree that if that happens we should fix it, maybe
it'll help us achieve better milestone stability ;)).
Cool, we agree :)
Thanks
-Vincent
On May 6, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
OK I think you did not understood what I proposed, where did I said
that we should do the upgrade only for final releases ? That's why I
did not understood when you talked about "reversed order". On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Nope. I'm proposing to install the RC1 version, not a SNAPSHOT.
On May 6, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>>
>> On May 6, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
>>
>>> I can take care of this (we should maybe add it to the release plan).
>>
>> Cool.
>>
>> I agree that it would be a good idea to add it the plan except that I think the
RM is already tired after a release :) So maybe it's nice if someone else can do the
upgrade (unless the RM is ok to do it ofc ;)).
>
> Does not have to be all in one row (it's OK if it's done a few days
> after the release) but IMO if we want it to be done for each release
> it makes it by definition part of the release and the release manager
> would be responsible for it (whether he/she do it or not is another
> matter).
Actually for me the order should be reversed:
* Start by installing RC1 on myxwiki.org to verify stability
* Then after a few days release final if ok
That would really be using myxwiki.org as it's supposed to be used.
Maybe that now we're using EM/DW it's going to be easy enough to do that quickly?
What you suggest is to install a SNAPSHOT which is not very easy or
natural. IMO it's OK to put last released version on
myxwiki.org, this
is validating a released version on a prod server.
After the fact is too late since if there are problems it means re-releasing a bug fix
release quickly. Of course it's better than not doing anything but less nice than
pushing RC1 releases on myxwiki.org. > Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think we should upgrade myxwiki.org to XWiki 5.0 ASAP.
We're supposed to use myxwiki.org as our test bed for latest versions but we're
not using it enough.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone who some free time/will to help upgrade myxwiki.org to
5.0?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Latest upgrades:
>>>>>>> http://myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XWiki/UpgradesLog
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From what I see Marius did an EM/DW upgrade last time so new
upgrades should be pretty simple.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>> .xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs