On Jan 11, 2008, at 6:28 PM, sdumitriu (SVN)
wrote:
Author: sdumitriu
Date: 2008-01-11 18:28:47 +0100 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 6782
Modified:
xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/pom.xml
xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/
render/groovy/GroovyTemplateEngine.java
xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/xwiki/
store/XWikiHibernateBaseStore.java
[snip]
Modified:
xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/
xpn/
xwiki/store/XWikiHibernateBaseStore.java
===================================================================
--- xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/
xwiki/
store/XWikiHibernateBaseStore.java 2008-01-11 14:01:44 UTC (rev
6781)
+++ xwiki-platform/core/trunk/xwiki-core/src/main/java/com/xpn/
xwiki/
store/XWikiHibernateBaseStore.java 2008-01-11 17:28:47 UTC (rev
6782)
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
try {
setHibUrl(XWiki.class.getClassLoader().getResource(path));
} catch (Exception ex2) {
- log.error("Failed setting the Hibernate
configuration file with any method, storage cannot be configured",
ex2);
+ log.error("Failed setting the Hibernate
configuration file with any method, storage cannot be configured");
Why are
we removing the stack trace? This is an error and the stack
trace will help debug the error.
The fact that the test is wrongly written is a different matter IMO.
The test must be forgetting to initialize something.
But we do need the max amount of info when debugging an ERROR level
error.
It wasn't an error until a few days ago, when I made it so. It wasn't
even reported before, it was considered something that cannot happen
and
ignored.