1 Nov
2008
1 Nov
'08
3:02 a.m.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Oct 31, 2008, at 6:46 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
Sounds good :)
Thanks.
- Asiri
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Jerome Velociter
<jerome(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
XP means XWiki Plugin...
However it's not just a plugin but an application and for now we've
decided to have only 1 JIRA project for both application and plugin so
it should be XAOFFICE instead... ;) Vincent Massol wrote:
I think office importer should have the XOFFICE code name. Because
office-importer surpasses all office suits (MsOffice, OpenOffice,
StarOffice) and formats. On Oct 30, 2008, at 12:47 PM, Guillaume Lerouge
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Jerome Velociter
> <jerome(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Florin Ciubotaru wrote:
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> We need to create a jira project for the MS Office integration.
>>> Jerome
>>> has proposed to put in "XWiki Core & Products" section, with
the
>>> "*XOFFICE*" key. WDYT?
>> I'm thinking about the Office integration as we have today the
>> Eclipse
>> integration, thus the idea of the XOffice key.
>>
>> A question remain : should the office importer project also be
>> part
>> of
>> the Office integration JIRA project ? I think it's ok for now, it
>> could
>> be a component of the project, as the microsoft addin would be. If
>> it's
>> not ok, then XOFFICE might not be the best name, it should then
>> reflect
>> the MS Office suite. XMSOFFICE ?
>
> I think they should both be part of the same project, separated as
> JIRA
> components, so keeping XOFFICE is fine with me.
No. that's not possible and not the way to do it in JIRA.
Remember that one jira project = same version = same release.
Ah, right. And
releasing them as a whole will not be really
possible I
guess. As well we will surely have distinct releases for word
integration and eventual outlook or other MS office integration.
Thus we
should have separated JIRA project for each product of the suite.
What do you think about the following :
* XWORD => MS Word integration
* XPOFFICE => Office importer plugin
Thanks
-Vincent
>
> Concerning the XWiki .net assembly, I don't have much idea. XDOTNET ?
>
> Jerome.
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> The first Add-in in the suite will be the Word Add-in and is
>>>>> currently
>>>>> named *XWriter*( XWord is another option).
>>>> I think XWord is a better name, it let us the possibility to have
>>>> XWriter for a future possible OOo integration.
>>>
>>> +1 for XWord for MSWord and thus XWriter for OOo Writer at a later
>>> stage.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> I target the first milestone
>>>>> release on November 19th, and a first final version somewhere
>>>>> around XE
>>>>> 1.8 final release date.
>>>> FYI, the features targeted for the first final versions are
>>>> described
>>>> here :
>>>>
>>>>
>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/MicrosoftOfficeAddin#HFirstversi…
>>>> .
>>>> Namely :
>>>> "
>>>> * Users will be able to create a new wiki page from Office(Word
>>>> works as an WYSIWYG using WebView to directly create HTML)
>>>> * Users can upload a local document to the wiki, as an attachment
>>>> * Users can export a local file as a wiki page.
>>>> "
>>>>
>>>> XE 1.8 should happen somewhere around the end of February 2009.
>>>> Now
>>>> you
>>>> should propose a breakdown of the features in this roadmap for the
>>>> 1.0
>>>> version in several milestones. I think 3 milestones of 3/4 weeks
>>>> each is
>>>> good for the 1.0 cycle - keeping in mind we want to be able to
>>>> ship
>>>> it
>>>> with XE 1.8 (this way, remains 3/4 weeks for debugging in releases
>>>> candidates phases) and keeping in mind too that you are working
>>>> only 50%
>>>> of your time on this project.
>>>>> The solution also contains a project named *XWikiLib*. This is an
>>>>> assembly that will contain most logic for the server connection
>>>>> and
>>>>> other utilities. It might be useful for other members of the
>>>>> community
>>>>> that may want to connect to XWiki from a .NET client.
>>>> This assembly should live in its own project, right ? It source
>>>> code
>>>> should also be separated from the actual office integration (the
>>>> add-in).
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jerome.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Florin Ciubotaru
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs