On 27 Mar 2017, at 18:01, Sarthak Gupta
<sarthakgupta072(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi
V
incent,
I am going through what you said and will try to think of some other
features that I can include in this glossary application.
My main query is that in my GSoC proposal I have to write about the
timeline in which i will carry out different tasks related to the project.
I am not able to get what should I include for different weeks and as a
part of my mid-term and end-term evaluation. I know that I have to divide
my tasks into smaller parts but not able to decide fully which parts are to
be carried out first and which are to be carried out latter.
I don't know if this is a legitimate query or not, because it's* my*
proposal and I should be the one framing it accordingly. :/
For example I propose the following order:
Step 1: Create Glossary app with ability to create new entries.
Step 2: Create Transformation to display glossary terms when a page is rendered
Step 3: Add ability to create glossary items in context
Step 4: Create a functional test to prove that steps 1, 2 and 3 work.
Step 5: Release + Document a first version
Step 6: <new idea1>
Step 7: <new idea2>
…
Now FYI, for an experienced xwiki dev this is roughly some ideas of timeframes:
Step 1: 0.5 day
Step 2: 1.5 days (including automated unit tests)
Step 3: 2 days
Step 4: 1 day
Step 5: 0.5 day
This is why I was suggesting that you include other ideas since even if you multiply these
delays to take into account the fact that you’re new to xwiki dev, it would still not
amount to that much :)
Thanks
-Vincent
Sarthak Gupta
On 26-Mar-2017 10:57 PM, "Vincent Massol" <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> Hi Sarthak,
>
>> On 26 Mar 2017, at 14:45, Sarthak Gupta <sarthakgupta072(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Vincent,
>> I am not able to decide how would my approach be like to develop the
>> glossary application. I have an idea what I need to do to develop this
> app
>> but couldn't able to decide the milestones(that I will write in my
>> proposal) I should set.
>>
>> The things I know are to be done are:
>>
>> - The glossary app homepage will be created by "App within minutes
>> application".
>
> Yes it’s fine to use AWM although it’s not required at all and another UI
> could be proposed/done.
>
> See
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/DevGuide/FAQTutoria
> l/FAQTutorialManual to understand how it works. You really need to
> understand this rather than use the AWM which hides how it works.
>
>> - Using rendering transformation to create links to the app and to
>> display the words.
>
> Yes,except not direct links but on hover information + link in the on
> hover popup.
>
>> - Developing the extension whose mechanism will be analogous to that of
>> annotation extension.
>
> I don’t know what you call “extension”. I think you mean the in-context
> creation of glossary entries.
>
>> - Linking the extension with the glossary home page and to pages
>> containing definition of words.
>
> What do you call extension? In XWiki an extension has a special meaning,
> see
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/
>
>> Please guide me.
>
> I would if I knew what you’re looking for precisely :)
>
> You’ve already listed several steps above. Couldn’t that be your
> milestones?
>
> IMO you should also propose other features that could be implemented
> depending on how fast you progress on the main features. I’ll give you 2
> examples (I’m not saying they’re the best but you should use your own
> experience/ideas by thinking about how you’d use this glossary feature and
> how to make it the best possible):
> * Provide an Admin UI to configure the Glossary application. For example
> to configure on which pages the transformation should execute (with regex
> includes/excludes)
> * Allow using Wikipedia (or other sources) to automatically gather
> information about glossary items.
>
> Thanks!
> -Vincent
>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -Sarthak Gupta
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sarthak,
>>>
>>>> On 24 Mar 2017, at 16:44, Sarthak Gupta
<sarthakgupta072(a)gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Vincent,
>>>>
>>>> I have created a design page
>>>>
>>>> Link:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/
>>> GlossaryApplication
>>>
>>> I’ve commented on the page.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I request you to review it and please tell me if anything needs to be
>>>> added/modified in it.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks :)
>>>>
>>>> Sarthak Gupta
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:21 AM, Sarthak Gupta <
>>> sarthakgupta072(a)gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Sarthak,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 20 Mar 2017, at 20:00, Sarthak Gupta
<sarthakgupta072(a)gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Vincent,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have come up with an idea that:
>>>>>>> 1. I will make an extension that will link to the Glossary
Page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The extension *is* the Glossary app. There’s no glossary page in
> XWiki
>>>>>> ATM. The point of this project is to create this app/extension.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I was talking about the home page(I will make) of the glossary app
> that
>>> I
>>>>> proposed. :P
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. The idea would be whenever a user will select a list of
words in
>>> the
>>>>>> page, then a button will appear just above the text.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok. We could also introduce a shortcut key as we have for
annotations
>>>>>> (ctrl+M).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess you’re referring to creating glossary entries right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yup, glossary entries will be created on clicking the 'Make
entry'
>>>>> button by admin or by shortcut key as proposed by you.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Because for viewing the the Rendering Transformation would
simply
>>> create
>>>>>> standard links IMO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I need to think how this will work.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3. On clicking that button a dialog box will appear on the
bottom
>>> right
>>>>>> of the screen that will specify some options as follows:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it should appear just below the word(s) you selected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, this would be better. The dialog box will move along the
screen
>>> as
>>>>> we move to the next word.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> (i)For a user: (a) "Word name"(one word at a time.
Next word could
>>>>>> be accessed by clicking an another button)
>>>>>>> (b) Short description of the word, with
a
> link
>>>>>> for 'Read More'. Clicking on 'Read more' will
direct the user to the
>>>>>> glossary page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it’s enough to do display that on hover without
clicking.
>>>>>> Clicking would go to the glossary page.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I agree with this too.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> (ii) For an Admin: (a) The JavaScript will scan each and
every
> word
>>>>>> of the selected text, and will display if a word in the selected
>>>>>> text is in the Glossary Page or not(by
the
>>> use
>>>>>> different color for each word that is 'in' and that is
'not in'
>>>>>> the glossary page.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That’s one way of doing it indeed. Another way (possibly better
or
> not
>>> -
>>>>>> We need to list the pros and cons of each approach) is to use a
>>> Rendering
>>>>>> Transformation since it’s meant for that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don’t understand why only admins would see glossary terms on
the
>>> page.
>>>>>> IMO everyone should see them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I meant to say that the users will be able to see the words
which
> have
>>>>> entries on the glossary page. But for admin, he would be able to
>>> see/select
>>>>> the both the words that are 'in' and 'not in' the
glossary page and
> make
>>>>> changes to them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> (b) Add the word to the glossary
page/
>>>>>> Make changes(which will direct the admin to the glossary page
and
> there
>>>>>> he could add new entries or make
>>> changes
>>>>>> to the original one).
>>>>>>> 4. The glossary page will simply be created with 'Create
Page'
>>> provided
>>>>>> in X-wiki I suppose. I need to think of interface :P.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IMO there should be 2 ways:
>>>>>> 1) same mechanism as for annotations
>>>>>> 2) on the glossary app home page with a form
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not able to grasp these points. So I would try discussing
it on
>>>>> IRCprobably .
>>>>>
>>>>>> It would be nice if you could create a design page on
>
design.xwiki.org
>>>>>> so that we can record all decisions that we take.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have initiated a page, and going through the tutorials on how
to
>>> use
>>>>> the 'design page' and 'create application'. I will
come out with
>>> something
>>>>> in few days. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Sarthak Gupta
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>