Hi Arvind,
On 9 Feb 2014 at 12:33:16, Arvind Gupta
(arvind.bernaulli@gmail.com(mailto:arvind.bernaulli@gmail.com)) wrote:
Guys I have come across this WYSIWYG editor, seems
good , Please have a
look
http://editor.froala.com/
Thanks for the idea! However it doesn’t look open source and thus I don’t think it would
be a good idea as the XWiki default WYSIWYG editor.
FTR, I’ve started a design page
at
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:24 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
wrote:
> And here’s the roadmap page updated:
>
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Roadmaps/WebHome
>
> When the committers who wish to work on the listed feature start their
> work, please edit that page to add the specific list of jira issue you’d
> like to implement in 6.0!
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> On 28 Jan 2014 at 11:17:29, vincent(a)massol.net (vincent(a)massol.net(mailto:
> vincent(a)massol.net)) wrote:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > XWiki 6.0
> > ========
> >
> > As usual here’s a proposal resulting from discussions I’ve had with
> XWiki committers who work at XWiki SAS for 6.0.
> >
> > * Collaborative Applications (Meeting, Calendar, (new) Forum, Tasks,
> Doodle, Photo) - Caty to work on usability and design (she’s started
> already at
http://design.xwiki.org if you wish to follow the work).
> Andrea who’s a contributor is helping on the test + implementation part.
> There might be another contributor joining too. This work is currently done
> inside xwiki-contrib.
> >
> > * New skin! Caty for the design and Guillaume Delhumeau for the
> implementation part. We’ve been dreaming about this skin for a while. Caty
> has whet our appetite with screenshots from Junco (
>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/JuncoSkin and
>
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Junco+Skin) and from
> Flamingo (
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Skin4x).
> The idea is to establish new strong foundations for new skins (like
> standardizing on bootstrap classes for example) + have a new L&F. Caty and
> Guillaume will make proposals on the list about this.
> >
> > * At last we agreed to work on identifying performances issues
> (especially page load times) and work to fix them! Thomas is in charge of
> leading this extra important domain. One idea is to establish some
> automated tests to measure current performances and get a baseline so that
> we can then monitor our progress and start fixing things (and ensure we
> keep getting better all the time in the future). Thomas will send some
> proposals on the list too on this to let us know how he plans to tackle
> performance improvements.
> >
> > * Of course we need to keep some time to fix any remaining issues we get
> on the major feature we developed in 5.x + some improvements. I’m thinking
> about our SOLR search, Multiwiki integration, EM/DW, scalable
> import/export, etc. Thomas needs to finish the scalable import feature
> which is already well under way (see below).
> >
> > * Marius agreed to lead an investigation on CKEditor to see if it would
> make sense for us to use it as a replacement of our homemade editor. The
> general issue is that maintaining a WYSIWYG editor takes time and this is
> not really our core business at xwiki. We have 2 choices basically: have
> someone constantly working on improving our WYSIWYG editor or integrate an
> existing one so that we can benefit from the work of others. In the past
> few years we haven’t added that many features to our editor so it’s time to
> evaluate the feasibility and cost of using an external editor such as
> CKEditor.
> >
> > * The way users develop applications in XWiki hasn’t changed much over
> the past 10 years. Since then there’s been an explosion in the area of JS
> frameworks. We want to make it super easy to develop modern applications
> using XWiki (read ajaxy applications with new dev models). Marius agreed to
> lead this investigation along with the help of Guillaume Delhumeau. Since
> it’s an important aspect of XWiki and a complex one, they’ll need to drive
> various discussions and brainstorming with everyone and make some proposals
> so that we all agree to the directions we wish to go towards and so that we
> can start implementing it in 6.1.
> >
> > * Denis is going to continue working on Script signing as way to replace
> the existing Programming Rights which has shown its limitations. Denis has
> committed a new Crypto API in 5.x which is a strong base for the script
> signing implementation.
> >
> > In addition, during those discussions some raised a list of JIRA they
> consider important and that would be interesting to tackle if we get the
> time:
> >
> > - Support 2 roles for users for app within minutes: application creator
> and data creator - XWIKI-8757
> > - xwiki.cfg & xwiki.properties merging
> > - Add default column and sort choices in AppWithinMinutes livetable
> setting - XWIKI-9659
> > - Save & view a section should go to the section anchor instead of the
> top of the document - XE-1335
> > - Add a message for the Livetable's empty state - XWIKI-7821
> > - "Space Templates" should also create the space preferences page -
> XWIKI-9712
> > - The Wiki UIExtensions should check the rights before executing
> extension points - XWIKI-9156
> > - Add an explanation next to the fields in user profile - XWIKI-6307
> > - When creating a new sub-wiki, pages are listed with guest - XWIKI-9888
> > - Cannot remove all panels using the Panel Wizard for space preferences
> - XWIKI-9891
> >
> > Please comment if anyone sees a concern or if I have forgotten something!
> >
> > XWiki 5.4.1
> > =========
> >
> > In addition we identified the need for a 5.4.1 release to:
> > - finish important issues for the 5.x cycle and any leftover from 5.4.
> Our idea is to have usable and stable implementation for the bug items we
> worked on in 5.x: SOLR search, multiwiki integration, EM/DW and scalable
> export (scalable import has been pushed to 6.0 since we considered it too
> dangerous to plug by default in the default import UI in 5.x).
> > - implement support for IE11 (there are only a few issues open). Marius
> agreed to work on the IE11 fixes. The reason we wish to implement this
> support is because we’re seeing more and more users reporting issues and
> asking for this support. ATM we support IE till IE9 only. IE10&11 are
> currently not officially supported at
>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/BrowserSupportStrategy It
> would be nice that after 5.4.1 we could edit this doc and mark them
> supported!
> >
> > Dates
> > =====
> >
> > I’m proposing the date of 17 of Feb for the final release of 5.4.1,
> assuming 5.4 is released on the 3rd of Feb as currently planned (i.e. 2
> weeks after the release of 5.4).
> >
> > For 6.0:
> > - 5.0M1: 10th of March 2014 (ie 3 weeks)
> > - 5.0M2: 31st of March 2014 (ie 3 weeks)
> > - 5.0RC1: 14th of April 2014 (ie 2 weeks)
> > - 5.0Final: 28th of April 2014 (ie 2 weeks)
> >
> > TOTAL: 10 weeks, ie 2.5 months.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent