+1
I'd say the fewer the better ftm. We'll refactor later if we need finer grained
categories.
Vincent Massol wrote:
My list:
Formatting: (macros that format something)
- Error/Warning/Info/Message
- Code
- Box
- Footnote
Development: (dev macros)
- HTML
- Script/Groovy/Ruby
- Velocity
Content: (macro that produce some content)
- Include
- User Avatar
- Chart
- Formula
- RSS
- PutFootnotes
Navigation: (macro used for navigation)
- Toc
- Id (could go in other too)
Other:
Thus I propose to have only a single Content category for internal/
external content for now since 1) we can't use long names and 2) we
don't have enough macros to make the separation.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 19, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Hi Devs,
we need a list of macro categories to get started with. One of the
current
requirements is that each category name has to be one-word long for
technical reasons for now.
Here's my initial list:
- All (all macros listed in this one)
- Presentation
- Error
- Warning
- Information
- Code
- Box
- Code
- HTML
- Script
- Velocity
- Groovy
- Include
- Wiki (Wiki Content, Internal content would be better but it's 2
words
long)
- User avatar
- Footnote
- Navigation
- Table of Contents
- Id
- Maths
- Formula
- Chart
- External Content (can't find a one-word name for this one)
- RSS
- Other (for new macros and unclassified macros)
I'm looking for your feedback / improvement ideas.
Thanks,
Guillaume
--
Guillaume Lerouge
Product Manager - XWiki
Skype: wikibc
Twitter: glerouge
http://guillaumelerouge.com/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs