28 May
2016
28 May
'16
3:56 p.m.
On 28 May 2016, at 15:06, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
We can reconcile this FTM by saying that the naming rule of <type>-<module>-
is only for the top level name. And submodules always follow the rule of
<topmodulename>-<submodule>.
Thanks
-Vincent
On 28 May 2016, at 15:02, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Contrib don’t have the same naming at all than xwiki github org.
For xwiki github org we have: xwiki-<module>-<submodules>
For contrib github org we have: <type>-<module>-<submodules> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Just the concept is enough, especially if we are talking about
prefixes like "all" and "other" won't don't indicate
anything.
Hi devs,
This is a reminder for naming the contrib projects. FYI there are some guidelines here:
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/#HChoosingthename
For example for authenticators it’s authenticator-<xxx>.
I see for example the android-authenticaitor module which should be renamed
authenticator-android IMO.
It's not the same thing. This is an Android application and
implementing Android authentication API, so very different from other
authenticator-* which are authenticator you install in XWiki.
>
> Regarding https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/oidc we need to decide what to do on 2
aspects (I’m taking the examle of oidc but this just serves as an examle for the generic
discussion):
>
> * How do we name repositories that contain various types of sub modules? Just use the
concept name as Thomas did for odidc? Or should be define a prefix such as “all-oidc” or
“other-oidc” or something else. I think just the concept name is ok. WDYT? >
> * odic contains 2 submodules right now: oidc-authenticator and odic-provider. Should
this be named authenticator-odic and provider-odic instead to be in sync with
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/#HChoosingthename. I think so. WDYT?
I really don't think so. I prefer that submodules have consistent id
naming in their own world. If we go this road then we should change
the ids of most of the platform modules… Thanks
-Vincent
>
>>>
>>> See also my other mail about the jira module refactorings.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent