27 Jun
2016
27 Jun
'16
4:39 p.m.
Also, with the recent strategy change, shouldn`t we be discussing moving
ratings out of platform and back to contrib?
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Do we have a strategy for retired projects?
They have been marked as [Retired] in JIRA, but this doesn't prevent users
from creating issues or add new code there.
Should we have deleted the contrib sources? Should we at least change
permissions and restrict creation of issues and code commits? Do we plan to
maintain in parallel the 2 repos?
Thanks,
Caty
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Victor Rachieru <victor.rachieru(a)xwiki.com
wrote:
> The new module can be a new version of the one on xwiki-contrib and not
> break the extensions that have a dependency to the old module.
> The script service basically remains
intact. The methods contained by
that
> The issue that arises from changing
the package name is that any code
that
> uses classes from that package explicitly will be broken.
> Example:
> -----
> Say you have a java or groovy script in which you
> want to use a class from the ratings api package or typed variables. That
> code will be broken due to the fact that packages don't match anymore.
> org.xwiki.contrib.ratings.Rating
myRating = new
> org.xwiki.contrib.ratings.Rating();
> or
> org.xwiki.contrib.ratings.RatingAPI myRating =
> services.ratings.getRating(doc, author);
> on the other hand
> services.ratings.getRating(doc,
author).getVote(); should be ok
> The question is:
> -----
> Is there somebody who used classes from the api package in their code or
> the use of this module has been limited to calling the service from
> velocity and just setting/getting votes?
> Thanks,
> Victor
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:30 PM,
Thomas Mortagne <
thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com
> > wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 4:11 PM,
Victor Rachieru
> > <victor.rachieru(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> > > Hei devs,
> > > > > I intend to
integrate the ratings application which is now on
> > xwiki-contrib
> > > into the xwiki-platform.
> > > > > This in mainly
due to 3 points:
> > > -----
> > > 1/ give the ability to use ratings in a wiki
> > > 2/ using it to provide ratings for the Extension Repository
Application
> > > (XWIKI-7780)
> > > 3/ display ratings within Extension Manager (XWIKI-11509)
> > > > > The first point
can be accomplished by using the ratings app as is
but
> > the
> > > other two imply that the ratings app should be a module that is
> > maintained
> > > by XWiki. It makes sense that if the Extension Repository App and
> > Extension
> > > Manager which are maintained by XWiki depend on the Ratings App, that
> > this
> > > itself is maintained by XWiki as well.
> > > > > The steps needed
for this is as follows:
> > > -----
> > > 1/ create a new module in the xwiki-platform core for the ratings
> > > - xwiki-platform-core
> > > -- xwiki-platform-ratings
> > > --- xwiki-platform-ratings-api
> > > --- xwiki-platform-ratings-ui
> > > 2/ change the artifact id from "application-ratings" to
> > > "xwiki-platform-ratings"
> > > 3/ change the package from "org.xwiki.contrib.ratings" to
> > > "org.xwiki.platform.ratings"
> > > > > Implications
> > > -----
> > > 1/ clone of the existing code is now in xwiki-platform under a
> different
> > > artifact id (having duplicate code, this takes us to #2)
> > > 2/ the code from xwiki-contrib would probably have to be deemed as
> > "retired"
> > > 3/ the applications with a dependency to the xwiki-contrib ratings
> would
> > > have to be upgraded to depend on the module from xwiki-platform
> > > 4/ the script service would remain unchanged (changing the artifact
id
> > and
> > > package name does not affect the service)
> > > 5/ if by any chance someone has code that uses the classes from the
> > ratings
> > > app on contrib, by upgrading, that code will cease to function
> > > > > Please state you
position on this matter.
> > > > > Links
> > > -----
> > > http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Ratings+API
> > >
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Ratings+Application
> > > https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-ratings
> > > > > Thank you,
> > > Victor
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > devs mailing list
> > > devs(a)xwiki.org
> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > > Either the the new module
is a new version and it should keep
> > retro-compatibility to not instantly break all extensions using the
> > old app when you upgrade XWiki (but given the fact that we are not
> > going to keep org.xwiki.contrib.ratings package I doubt this is an
> > option) or we make sure the new module and the old module can run at
> > the same time in the same instance which means no conflicts (different
> > script service ids, different pages names when they are completely
> > different from old ones, etc).
> > > --
> > Thomas Mortagne
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > devs(a)xwiki.org
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >
_______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
service maintain the same signatures. Nothing has
changed from this point
of view.
So previous versions of the ratings module (the ones from contrib) can
use
> the service just as before without it breaking things.