On Sep 3, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi Caty,
On Sep 2, 2013, at 1:44 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
We've recently discussed about renaming the notion of (sub)wiki from
"wiki" to "subwiki". We've discussed this in the context of
integrating
creation of (sub)wikis by default in the platform and in XE. So the latest
discussion seemed to agree about:
* Calling the whole system a "Wiki"
* Calling each (sub)wikis a "SubWiki"
Now, I was working on updating the new model branch I have created to
align to this and to rename my Server class to a Wiki class and my existing
Wiki class to a SubWiki class…
I've realized that aligning our API on this is a huge task since we have
tons of APIs using the word "wiki". Just to cite 3:
* WikiReference (reference)
* WikiComponentScope.WIKI (wiki component)
* WikiDeletedEvent (bridge)
It's a bit everywhere and changing that seems too big a task IMO.
Thus we have 2 real choices IMO:
* Agree that the UI has a different wording than the API: SubWiki for the
UI and Wiki for the API
* Don't use subwiki in the UI and keep using Wiki in the UI and find
another word to represent the whole system (System/Portal/Wiki System/WMS =
Wiki Management System/Home/etc).
As already stated in the previous workspace mails, I prefer the wiki + home
variant.
So in the Add menu we would have:
Add > Wiki
Home cannot represent the whole system IMO. It could possibly represent the main wiki but
I don't see how it could represent the whole system. Said differently I have a hard
time imagining a Home.java class representing the whole system. Am I the only one?
You need to explain how you see the "whole system" exposed in the UI.
I don't think we need to have it exposed in the UI. I was thinking mostly about
xwiki.org documentation and API (like the new model).
Suppose we call it "Foo", what will the
"Foo" link lead to? It has to
be a document. With our current capabilities it can only be a document
on the main wiki, so the main wiki _represents_ the whole system. It's
not the whole system, it's just the entry point (Home) for the whole
system. Same as the root node of a tree represents/defines the tree
even if it's just a node in the tree like the rest and not the entire
tree.
To summarize, I think we can have Home in the UI and System in Java.
Ok.
The other decision related to this is whether we stop calling the main wiki "the main
wiki" in the API for example… That's a tough one since we're all so used to
calling it the main wiki… Calling it the Home wiki and changing the API would take time ;)
Any idea?
Thanks
-Vincent
I'm also for Add > Wiki
Thanks,
Marius
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Caty
>>
>>
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent