31 Jul
2007
31 Jul
'07
4:31 p.m.
We can use java Boolean type, in place of boolean, that can be true,
false or null has any java Object.
2007/7/31, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu.dumitriu(a)gmail.com>om>:
The problem is that boolean fields also have -1 as a
possible value,
which means "not specified". So there will be a problem with this,
since we can't tell what 'not specified' should be, true or false.
On 7/30/07, Erin Schnabel <ebullient.rain(a)gmail.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On 7/30/07, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Sergiu
--
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
Hi XWikiers,
In BaseClass there is possibility to add Boolean type field with
"addBooleanField". In XwikiDocument (and then in BaseCollection), we
use "getIntValue" and "setIntValue" to retrieve or set the value
with
0=false and 1=true. It's very simple but I think a
"get/setBooleanValue" that do the conversion would be much more
readable and avoid developper to search how boolean values are really
stored.
Regards,
Thomas Mortagne
Agreed. Every time I use a Boolean value, I have to remember this. I
don't do it so often that it's ingrained.. :-P