On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 08:24, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
  Hi devs,
 As you probably know by now, Hudson has been split in 2:
 * Jenkins: Kohsuke and all other committers forked and renamed Hudson since
 there were trademarks issues with Oracle
 * Hudson: continuing work by Oracle
 Some more info:
 
http://jenkins-ci.org/content/whos-driving-thing
 One thing to note is that Sonatype has sided with Oracle:
http://www.sonatype.com/people/2011/02/our-focus-on-advancing-hudson-and-ma…
 Now we need to pick a version: Jenkins or Hudson (community or Oracle).
 Personally I'm more tempted to follow Jenkins for the time being since:
 1) it's the community after all and they're the one who've been doing the
 work all these past years
 
I agree strongly,
+1 for Jenkins !
Denis
  2) they're not going to change how jenkins works
whereas my understand is
 that the hudson architecture will be changed (at least that's what Sonatype
 wants). So in the short period if we want to continue using stable versions
 the Jenkins path is the safest one. We can then review our choice when
 Hudson releases new versions.
 The first official release of Jenkins is out (1.396). See changelog at
 
http://jenkins-ci.org/changelog
 Since we're using 1.367 it's a good time to upgrade IMO.
 Note that Jenkins is simply a find/replace of Hudson to Jenkins and it's a
 drop in replacement (see
 
http://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Upgrading+from+Hudson+to+Jenkins
 ).
 WDYT?
 Thanks
 -Vincent
 _______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
 
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO