Hi Vincent,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:19 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
Hi Caty,
On 17 Feb 2016 at 17:44:56, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) (valicac(a)gmail.com
(mailto:valicac@gmail.com)) wrote:
Fixed the links
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This proposal wants to improve the current download page layout found
at
>
http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download
>
>
> The proposal is here:
>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/
>
> bin/view/Proposal/
>
> XWikiOrgDownload2Layout
>
>
> The proposal splits the current information into multiple pages
(version,
> type). Make sure you read the
"Changes" section from the proposal.
>
> Let me know what you think.
I really like the new Download page (LTS, Stable, Dev). Much nicer and
cleaner than the current version! :)
However I’m not sure about the second download page with the Local,
Server, Debian boxes. There are several issues for me:
* The Local packagings can be used on a server
* The server packagings can be used locally
* The Debian packaging can be used both locally and on a server
So currently the documentation pages use terms like "Standalone
distribution" and "WAR package". For me these naming are not user-friendly
and I might not know what the acronym stands for or what standalone means.
That's why I suggested Local and Server, since they are more simplistic but
yes maybe they are not truly correct. Maybe we can iterate more on the
naming but we need an improvement here since we want to encourage "local"
testing even for not so technical users/administrators.
* Server is not a good differentiator since XWiki is a
Server app even if
you install it locally ;)
* BTW it’s misising the other tutorials and other packagings (the yaourt
one for example)
To be honest I didn't know what you were referring to until I found
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/AdminGuide/Installation#HUsingyaou…
When I did the re-design I took the information from the Download page and
the "yaourt" one is missing.
In order to fix this we could modify the third column called now "Debian
Installation" into a other operating systems ways of installing ( or
another name ) and list there links towards the Debian and Arch Linux
install documentation.
* And even more important it’s also missing Cloud
solutions. I’d really
like if we could list the various cloud solutions offered by companies
participating to the xwiki development (and possibly list
myxwiki.org too
but if we list it, we need to put visible disclaimer since it’s a test farm
with no warranties and for non-business/personal projects only).
IMO this should be a total different page, let's call it "Test Drive XWiki"
or "Try XWiki" or "Evaluate XWiki" that could showcase Playground,
MyXWiki
and other Cloud solutions, but this should be part of a different proposal
than the Download page (which lists versions and install methods).
Currently I didn't tackled this proposal yet.
So maybe we shouldn’t discriminate between Local, Server, Debian but maybe
instead between “On-Premises” and “Cloud”, WDYT?
I'm not sure what "On Premises" means although I know it's an used
term,
but I don't find it very clear and not sure if it describes well the zip,
war, etc. options.
The problem is that we list the "Local, Server, Debian" install options
after you selected the version you want to download. So I find it a bit odd
for an user to be convinced that he wants to download XWiki, select his
version and then be presented with the Cloud Solutions. Cloud solutions
should be part of an evaluation step, before and independent of the
download step.
Thanks,
Caty
Thanks
-Vincent
> Thanks,
> Caty
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs