11 Sep
2006
11 Sep
'06
10:23 a.m.
jeremi joslin wrote:
On 9/11/06, Guillaume Sauthier
<Guillaume.Sauthier(a)objectweb.org> wrote:
I like macro because installation is sooo
simple !
You just have to drop a jar file in your XWiki installation and you're
done !
I know that XWiki plugins are not so hard to install (this is just a
property to modify) but that's still harder to change something in a
file manually than dropping a jar somewhere.
I think I'm missing an example for the plugins rendering part.
Where is this macro.vm ?
Is this allowing us to call our macro the usual macro way ?
{mymacro:<my parameters>}
Hi Gang !
I've got some questions concerning the development of XWiki extensions :
I've written a simple radeox macro that output a table; basically, it
outputs "{table}" with contents in the macro writer.
It works really fine until I decided to use the macro content
(params.getContent()) !
If I only use my macro like this ({mymacro:<params>}), outputed tables
seems to be interpreted correctly. But if I have the content
({mymacro}<content>{mymacro}), inner {table} seems to be no more
interpreted. Why ?
Other question : Is this possible to configure a radeox macro as easily
as an xwiki plugin ?
I was going to give you has example your code :-)
With XWiki plugins, you have a context, and then
you can access the Wiki
and its configuration.
But how can I do the equivalent with radeox macro ?
Why you don't want to use
plugins? It's better to use a plugin,
because the plugin can give you the data, and after you render them in
a velocity macro (like in macro.vm)
I or Ludovic will reply to your others questions later, i should look
for the answer. :-)
Thanks
Guillaume
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws