I used the Presentation Application in the past and I liked it.
Unfortunately I didn't had the time to improve it. I would recommend it
Thanks,
Marius
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Update: we now have 29 recommended extensions on
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ExtensionCode/
RecommendedExtensions/
I think it’s a good start and I’m going to work with Caty to make it
visible on the home page of e.x.o. Please reply quickly if you don’t agree
:)
Then we can iterate if you think some other extensions should be
recommended. In term of process, for now, could you please avoid directly
changing the recommended status for extensions on e.x.o and instead contact
me or reply to this thread? (I’d like to keep some control on that FTM
since this is new).
Thanks
-Vincent
On 23 May 2016, at 10:39, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
We have a lot of entries on
extensions.xwiki.org (869 as of today) and
this causes
some problems for our users:
P1) A lot of them are not of good quality (they don’t work with the
latest
versions, they are complex to use, they’ve not been updated for a
long time and are doing old and deprecated ways of doing things such as not
providing an entry in the Applications Panel for example, they’re not just
polished, etc) and this causes frustrations for our users. Note that this
also reflects on the overall quality of the XWiki project and product.
P2) It’s hard for users to locate good extensions among the rest.
We’ve started addressing P1) by introducing ratings on e.x.o. This is
not fully
successful so far because we don’t have enough people voting and
because those ratings are not used to display/filter extensions on the
Extensions LT or inside XWiki in the EM UI. So we need to continue this
effort.
Note that this proposal is not addressing non-extensions such as
snippets which
we’ll need to move elsewhere at some point but that becomes
less important with the proposal below.
Proposal
=======
I’d like to propose an additional strategy that, IMO, is better suited
for the
size of our community: curation. Curation is the process of
hand-selecting the best extensions and marking them as recommended. The
idea would be to list recommended extensions first on the e.x.o home page,
in the EM UI in XWiki and even in extension search results. In the EM UI,
an idea would also be to have a new “Recommended Extensions” filter in
addition to the existing filters (core extensions, installed extensions,
etc) and that would be the default filter on the “Add Extensions” UI.
I propose to add a “Recommended” xproperty in the Repository app for
that. We can
decide whether we want this just for e.x.o or committed in the
Repository app in xwiki-platform.
Then we need to decide about the curation process:
* The XWiki core committers are in charge (i.e. have the responsibility)
of
monitoring the apps that are marked “Recommended”, ie. validating that
it’s done correctly. XWiki core committers have the authorization to unset
an app that was marked a recommended by a community member.
* We wouldn’t offer a simple way in the UI to
mark an extension as
recommended since we don’t want everyone who has an account on
xwiki.org
to start marking apps as recommended. OTOH we want to allow people from the
xwiki community to help out. So the way to mark an extension as recommended
would be to use the object editor (for now, we can define a better
implementation mechanism later on).
* We define some basic rules that extensions need
to follow at minimum
to be accepted as recommended. These will be our guidelines to
avoid
conflict of opinions (although there’s always the possibility in which case
it’s resolved through a vote):
- Need to work on LTS + latest XWiki version (ie.
ATM that would be
7.4.x and 8.1)
- Need to present a polished aspect and be easily
usable
- Need to follow most of the best practices defined on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/
ApplicationDevelopmentBestPractices. Some important examples: technical
pages are hidden, extension is registered in the app bar when it makes
sense, extension is internationalized (if it makes sense), pages are in
xwiki syntax 2.0+.
WDYT?
I’m willing to help do the work and mark extensions as recommended.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs