On 23 Aug 2017, at 14:45, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Clément Aubin <aubincleme(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi everyone !
So, recently I have been dealing with a module that uses two kind of
translation strings.
- "Static" translations : the title of a block, a xHint, … the
translation key itself is not meant to be changed over time.
- "Dynamic" translations : things like :
- mymodule.component.<componentId>.name
- mymodule.component.<componentId>.description
Those are translation strings that depend on a parameter (here
componentId) that can be part of a list.
If you want a better in-context example, check out this gist :
https://gist.github.com/aubincleme/19edb249082185deedc8ec36fe354d42
Currently, we don’t have a lot of best practices regarding the
translation keys (see the doc :
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/DevelopmentPractices#
HTranslationBestPractices),
so it may b nice to think about improving them.
We have quite a few best practice rules, but on
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/L10N%20Conventions , which is
linked from the place you mentioned.
>
> Here are some proposals :
>
> * For translation keys used for a livetable, we could use the following
> : <prefix>.<liveTableId>Table.<columnName> or
> <prefix>.table.<columnName> if the livetable doesn’t have a specific id.
>
> * If we deal with "dynamic" translation keys, it would be nice to mark
> them as different from the others with an underscore (_) prefix, or a
> specific keyword.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Thanks,
> Clément