On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Marius Dumitru
Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 28 May 2016, at 15:06, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On 28 May 2016, at 15:02, Thomas Mortagne <
thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Mortagne
>> >> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>> >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Vincent Massol <
vincent(a)massol.net>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> Hi devs,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This is a reminder for naming the contrib projects. FYI there
are
>> some guidelines here:
>>
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/#HChoosingthename
>> >>>>
>> >>>> For example for authenticators it’s authenticator-<xxx>.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I see for example the android-authenticaitor module which should
be
>> renamed authenticator-android IMO.
>> >>>
>> >>> It's not the same thing. This is an Android application and
>> >>> implementing Android authentication API, so very different from
other
>> >>> authenticator-* which are
authenticator you install in XWiki.
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Regarding
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/oidc we need to
decide
>> what to do on 2 aspects (I’m taking the examle of oidc but this just
serves
>> as an examle for the generic
discussion):
>> >>>>
>> >>>> * How do we name repositories that contain various types of sub
>> modules? Just use the concept name as Thomas did for odidc? Or should
be
>> define a prefix such as “all-oidc” or
“other-oidc” or something else. I
>> think just the concept name is ok. WDYT?
>> >>
>> >> Just the concept is enough, especially if we are talking about
>> >> prefixes like "all" and "other" won't don't
indicate anything.
>> >>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> * odic contains 2 submodules right now: oidc-authenticator and
>> odic-provider. Should this be named authenticator-odic and
provider-odic
think
so. WDYT?
>>
>> I really don't think so. I prefer that submodules have consistent id
>> naming in their own world. If we go this road then we should change
>> the ids of most of the platform modules…
>
> Contrib don’t have the same naming at all than xwiki github org.
>
> For xwiki github org we have: xwiki-<module>-<submodules>
> For contrib github org we have: <type>-<module>-<submodules>
We can reconcile this FTM by saying that the
naming rule of
<type>-<module>- is only for the top level name. And submodules always
follow the rule of <topmodulename>-<submodule>.
Repeating the top module name is redundant IMO, that's why I've used
application-ckeditor/ui and application-filemanager/api
You are talking about the folder here while the discussion is more
about the module name IMO. We could indeed start another discussion
about the folder name but I don't think we should mix.
So you did prefixed all submodule with top level id too :)
And yes the way I understood it the rule about
suffixes like
"application-", "api-" was only about top level modules for me.
Then I
find way cleaner you have consistent naming inside the same
repository.
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/VOTE-Remove-all-duplicated-information-fr…
Thanks,
Marius
Thanks
-Vincent
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
>>
>>>>
>>>> See also my other mail about the jira module refactorings.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs