I would say generally speaking the longer we wait to align our syntax
with markdown the more non-standard and irrelvant our syntax will become.
If we were building XWiki from scratch today, we would be royal fools not
to adhere to what is essentially a universal standard for syntax.
But even though we're not building it today, many people are trying it
today and for someone who doesn't know or care about the bad old days
before markup was standardized, we're just another incompatible format
with no significant market share.
Same story is true for Bootstrap. 5 years ago there was no coherent
standard, now there is.
tl;dr it sucks but we have to.
Thanks,
Caleb
On 25/11/15 09:05, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
  Hi Devs,
 as you probably noticed it, Markdown has recently become somewhat of a
 reference syntax for many developer tools, most notably GitHub. I have
 recently discussed with teams using XWiki who are also using GitHub and
 Slack and who are interested in being able to use Markdown syntax inside
 XWiki.
 Although it is already possible to use Markdown syntax in XWiki in a
 limited way <http://rendering.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Markdown11>, I
 don't think that a wiki could really work with only Markdown, due to the
 following limitations:
     1. We have invested a lot in the XWiki rendering and the XWiki 2.1
     syntax in order to make them address a lot of use cases and work seamlessly
     with the WYSIWYG editor
     2. Conversely, Markdown syntax is very limited by design
     <https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax> and does not
     support many of the important features of XWiki syntax, forcing users to
     rely on HTML for a lot of use cases
 What's interesting however is that Markdown syntax is very close to XWiki
 syntax in a number of regards, notably line breaks, bold and lists. Some
 notable differences include the syntax for links, images and code blocks.
 My line of thinking is the following: what if we made it possible as an
 option for users of XWiki 2.1 syntax to have XWiki interpret the main
 elements of Markdown syntax? In practice, this would mean adding a set of
 5-10 additional rules to the rendering engine.
 The obvious benefit would be to improve adoption of XWiki by dev teams who
 are already familiar with Markdown. I don't see any obvious drawbacks
 (besides the need to code and maintain the feature of course), but I
 clearly don't master all the subtleties of the XWiki rendering engine.
 Thanks,
 Guillaume
 _______________________________________________
 devs mailing list
 devs(a)xwiki.org
 
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs