9 Mar
2012
9 Mar
'12
3:47 p.m.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Jackson is considered faster, by several orders. Some articles/threads
that talks about it :
- http://www.lshift.net/blog/2011/12/28/benchmarking-simple-json-generation-i…
- http://www.sencha.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-94883.html
It can be a case for Jackson : if we are to use that tool for
generating livetable values, performance is a big deal.
my 2 cents
Jerome
On Mar 9, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
Fine.. since json-lib is already used in public API
(com.xpn.xwiki.plugin.packaging.PackageAPI) I'll stick with it. On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 14:54, Marius Dumitru
Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1 to use only one json lib in xwiki! :) Hi devs,
Some time ago Jerome Velociter raised a vote [1] for adding a JSON
Velocity Tool. The vote passed but the tool wasn't committed. I'd like
to do it know (for 4.0M1) with two changes:
1. Use Jackson [2] instead of json-lib [3] because it has a more recent
release
Isn't json-lib already a dependency available, should we use another one ?
Thanks,
Marius
--
Jérôme Velociter
Winesquare
http://www.winesquare.net/
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> 2. Add only the toJSON method for now because we can use
> $escapetool.javascript to accomplish the same result as toValueString
>
> Reply quickly if you are against it.
>
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/devs@xwiki.org/msg11395.html
> [2] http://jackson.codehaus.org/
> [3] http://json-lib.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs