27 Oct
2015
27 Oct
'15
1:57 p.m.
Hi,
I have created https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12736 for this
improvement.
Regards,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
2015-10-26 10:53 GMT+01:00 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>om>:
wiki,
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Marius Dumitru
Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu>
wrote:
>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> It looks like a bug to me, but wiki macro defined for global level in
a
>> subwiki, are effectively influencing the
whole farm.
>
>
> If the wiki macro is saved by a global user that has PR.
>
>
>> I would like to change
>> that like this:
>>
>> * global level macro are registered global only if defined in the
main
> wiki
> * global and wiki level macro defined in a subwiki are registered at
wiki
>> level
>>
>> The rationals are:
>>
>> * if the same global macro document is deployed on more than one >> which just means the same extension
defining that document is
installed
on
>> multiple wiki, maybe in different version, all those macros will be in
>> conflict, it will not be easy to know which one wins, and even more
>> difficult to detect the problem in the first place.
>>
>
> This can happen also if two different extensions define a macro with
the
same name
(in two different documents), but I guess this is less
probable.
> * there is risk (of course limited by the PR), that user of subwiki
> influence the behaviors of the whole farm, which IMO is quite opposite
to
the
logical structure, and even the physical storage we are used to.
What do you mean by "user of subwiki"? It can be a global user.
I agree that subwikis should act as namespaces,
and normally you expect
something defined in an inner namespace to not be visible in the outer
namespace. So +1
+1
To be consistent we should apply the same logic to other related use
cases like translations.
Thanks,
Marius
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
* I do not see any benefit of putting a global
macro in a subwiki
wdyt ?
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs