6 Jul
2010
6 Jul
'10
10:34 a.m.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 09:42, Fabio Mancinelli
<fabio.mancinelli(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On 07/05/2010 10:34 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
xwiki-rest-model seems the right name yes.
On Jul 5, 2010, at 10:29 PM, Anca Luca wrote:
I actually don't need it urgently but since people started using the
REST Api (see previous messages in the ML) I thought it was a good thing
to do and, anyway, it's something that has to be done.
Concerning the risk, I didn't touch any .java code so it should be
pretty safe (I just moved the generation logic for the model in a
separate module, that's all)
What can be discussed it's just the name and the location of the module.
I used xwiki-rest-model in core. If you are fine with that I can commit
the changes. Hi Fabio,
I think as soon as possible as good, and RC phase is a good moment to do it.
I don't think RC is a good phase (it's a stabilization phase after all) but if
Fabio judges it's safe I'm fine too (provided he's ok to fix quickly any issue
that may arise. If he doesn't need it urgently then better wait for 2.5M1.
-Fabio
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne