Hi Christian,
On Aug 6, 2013, at 5:07 AM, Christian Meunier <christian.meunier(a)magelo.com> wrote:
[snip]
Ya programming right cant be stolen that easily but
you can do so much harm with just the edit permission...
I can wipe out an entire wiki, I can deny pretty much anyone any page, create abitrary
instances of objects etc...
I cant even understand how people can use Xwiki for a public wiki, it seems so easy to
mess up the whole thing.
[snip]
This is exactly what a wiki is for: an easy site to modify content. The reasons wikis are
powerful is precisely because of that: low barrier to contribution and ability to easily
modify content.
The promise of a wiki is that it's easy to rollback changes (easier than for someone
to deface it).
You can find a lot of instances of public wikis on the web that work quite well. Just to
cite 3 public instances using 3 different wiki engines:
* wikipedia (mediawiki)
*
xwiki.org (xwiki)
*
https://www.dokuwiki.org/ (for ex go to
https://www.dokuwiki.org/features and click the
edit pencil) (dokuwiki)
Now obviously, for this to work you need community members that watch for vandalism
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism).
But when you use a wiki, you want collaboration and this is small price to pay in
exchange. Obviously if your vandalism rate is higher than your contribution rate you
should ask yourself questions and take some actions! ;) But in general it's good to
keep things open till there are problems since closing things down will slow down
contributions.
Now XWiki is more than a wiki and we need to address all use cases. We currently have a
contributor working 100% of his time on security aspects. He's made a lot of pull
requests recently; some have been applied and others are being reviewed. To answer one of
your point, we've identified the need to require some permissions for adding/modifying
some xobjects.
Thanks
-Vincent