Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] [UX] User Statuses

Hi Thibaut, On 12/15/2010 01:34 AM, Thibaut Camberlin wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea< > mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com&gt;  wrote: > >> On 12/07/2010 03:40 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 18:13, Sergiu Dumitriu&lt;sergiu(a)xwiki.com&gt;

>>> >>>> On 12/02/2010 10:21 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Jerome Velociter wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea >>>>>> &lt;mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com&gt;    wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Caty, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/30/2010 10:02 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please provide feedback for this User Status proposal: >>>>>>>> >>>> >>

>>>>>>> >>>>>>> You used a rich text area in your proposal. Are you planning to

>> the >>>>>>> WYSIWYG editor for entering the status message? >>>>>> >>>>>> If we are going to develop a completion mechanism for references,

>>>>>> should be developed in the WYSIWYG in my opinion, and probably be >>>>>> available as a standard feature of it. >>>>> >>>>> Actually it should also be available in the wiki editor IMO (that

>>>> be soooo great :)). >>>>> >>>>> The syntax proposed by Caty in the screenshots can be wiki syntax.

>>>> very easy to add a "user" prefix for links that would be used like

>>>>> >>>>> [[user:<username>]] >>>> >>>> >>> @Jerome: Sure Jerome, wording is the easiest part. >>> >>> @Vincent: It was discussed in the past mails that the Activity will >>> integrate page, users, application events so that's why is placed

>>> If User Status is disabled, the Activity Macro will remain unchanged, >>> otherwise they combine. >>> >> >>> @Marius, @Vincent, @Sergiu: we could have this auto-complete feature >> inside >>> Wiki, WYSIWYG. The syntax proposed was inspired by the WYSIWYG and the >> macro >>> editing done by Marius. The implementation problems | difficulties

>> to >>> be discussed with Marius, because I don't know much about WYSIWYG >>> limitations. >> >> Do we need a rich text area for the user status? >> >> The WYSIWYG editor can be easily configured to display only the rich >> text area and its JavaScript API exposes most of the features that are >> normally available on the tool bar or the menu bar. Integrating the >> WYSIWYG editor with the user status feature shouldn't pose any

>> And image/link/macro autocomplete is definitely something that I'd like >> to implement for the WYSIWYG editor. >> > > Two remarks concerning autocomplete feature: > * IMO syntax "[[user:" is too complex for a normal user. Autocomplete

> * If WYSIWYG already has the needed API, this is great. My only concern

> that using the WYSIWYG does make loading time longer. Currently, loading

> page in WYSIWYG mode takes a significant amount of time (that is also

This is true. Note that I'm not necessarily for using the WYSIWYG editor, that's why I asked if we really need a rich text area for the status. On the other hand, the WYSIWYG editor code is not the only one that slows down the edit page. In my tests ( http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/2010-October/020308.html ) the editor alone loaded even in 1.3s . SmartClient and some other JavaScript extensions (some which are not event used in edit mode) add a significant amount of time. We need to improve the page loading speed.

Thanks, Marius > > Thanks, > Thibaut > > >> >> Thanks, >> Marius >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Caty >>> >>> >>>> +1 for adding support for user: links, since this would make it

>>>> in the future to have user accounts completely outside the XWiki >>>> platform (like external WebID or OpenID accounts). >>>> >>>>> We already support: >>>>> - document: [[doc:<docname>]] >>>>> - attachments: [[attach:<attachmentname>]] >>>>> - urls: [[url:<url>]] >>>>> and more >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> -Vincent >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It could then be used for the user statuses, with a stripped down >>>>>> version of the WYSIWYG without any buttons and menus. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jerome. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Marius >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Other references: >>>>>>>> * Proposal Code: >>>>>>>> >>>> >>

_______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs