2 Feb
2010
2 Feb
'10
7:48 p.m.
On 02/02/2010 06:27 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Feb 1, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Kind of, the license is in the pom. Although it does not appear in each
file, doesn't the fact that it's a file belonging to a LGPL project
almost make it LGPL too?
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
Hi devs,
I just noticed that although we've been saying that "This wiki is
licensed under a Creative Commons 2.0 license", all the source files for
the wiki pages are actually under the LGPL, which contradicts the wiki.
Actually our pages are under no license right now (There's no license in the XML
files and there should be one).