2 Mar
2015
2 Mar
'15
11:33 a.m.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marius Dumitru Florea <mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: [xwiki-devs] [Reminder] Using superadmin author for pages
not imported at runtime
To: "vincent(a)massol.net" <vincent(a)massol.net>
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:08 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On 2 Mar 2015 at 10:34:03, Marius Dumitru Florea
(mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com(mailto:mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com))
wrote:
Those are hidden documents that you rarely get to see. It's still not
nice but at least it's not very visible. While this
"Installed by superadmin."
will be visible whenever you look at the details of a XAR extension
installed by default (e.g. the Blog application).
I had forgotten about this vote. I'm not
against using a special
'system' user, but as Denis pointed out, we also have to think about
how this will be displayed in the UI (including localization). Until
we have this I'm -0.
Don’t forget that we’re already using that for all xclasses initialized by
java code. I don’t see why “superadmin” is not a good display
name for now (till we
introduce another System user).
Will a non-English speaker understand it? And even for those that
understand English it's gibberish, a technical identifier.
Thanks,
Marius
Thanks
-Vincent
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
> > Hi Vincent,
> >
> > Of course, I still agree with the above vote, but I think we should also
> > improve the display of the superadmin user, currently it does not have
> > any
> > display name, and IMO it will look odd to have more and more pages
> > created
> > and authored by "superadmin". I have actually not a clear idea about
the
> > right name, but it should be self explanatory, and superadmin is not in
> > my
> > opinion. I remember we talk about "System", which is a bit better,
but
> > we
> > may still find something better. "XWiki System",... please make
cleverer
> > proposal :)
> > WDYT ?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:56 AM, vincent(a)massol.net
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi devs,
> >>
> >> We already had a VOTE about this in the past (
> >> http://markmail.org/message/p5cvswxtrnm54i3m) where we agreed to use
> >> the
> >> superadmin user.
> >>
> >> I see it’s been done only for xclass pages created by XWiki so far.
> >>
> >> According to the VOTE we should also do that for pages imported by the
> >> packager plugin too.
> >>
> >> See also the comments at
> >>
> >>
> >>
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/commit/5d5020052983d1a4de255104f8a8…
> >>
> >> I hope devs still agree about that vote :) And for those who didn’t
> >> VOTE
> >> at the time, please reply to this mail.
> >>
> >> Note: I don’t find it normal that the packager plugin would use the
> >> Admin
> >> user since it’s a user that isn’t necessarily present in the wiki
> >> whereas
> >> the superadmin always is.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -Vincent
> >>