28 Nov
2008
28 Nov
'08
7:13 p.m.
On Nov 28, 2008, at 7:06 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
+1.
I don't like it very much either but I don't have any better proposal.
Some thoughts:
* subwiki is the best I have too. "sub" would really be too cryptic.
* URL rewriting should solve this partly if the user wants to change it
* in some relatively near future the user will be able to choose
himself the url format (that's the xwiki-url module I've been working
on but which is not used yet)
WDYT about asking our users their opinion ?
I'd rather we release it as is and act on feedback later since I don't
think we have the luxury of time.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Jerome Velociter
<jerome(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
+0
I don't like the "subwiki" pattern very much. (I would call it just
"sub" for example)
Jerome.
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs Hi devs,
I just finished a feature to be able to use mutiwiki without any use
of virtual host (ans so no need for a configured DNS server). It
does
not replace the DNS based multiwiki it just add another way to
access
subwiki so you can still use both. However all the URLs will be
generated in a way or another depending if urlpath is enabled or
not.
So basically it add the possibility to access the wiki "wikiname"
using http://127.0.0.1/xwiki/subwiki/wikinname/view/Main/WebHome.
See http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2824
Normally I would wait for 1.8 branch to commit this but we have an
internal need for it to be included in the 1.6 branch (and if it's
included in 1.6, why not include this in 1.7 ;)).
Can we include it safely in 1.6/1.7 ? : it should be, if you don't
enable xwiki.virtual.urlpath in xwiki.cfg (and it will be disabled
by
default), all will work exactly like this feature did not exists.
Here is my +1
Thanks,
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs