13 Apr
2010
13 Apr
'10
11:37 a.m.
On 04/13/2010 11:29 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost<ludovic(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Maybe it would be good for people to propose improved versions, but it
will be hard to improve readability while also maintaining the
style/logo idea.
One option would be to keep just the X from the logo, and use a normal
font for writing the actual product name (something like 4 does with the
pencils).
+1 for 4A
and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing
arm..
I can't read XWiki in it..
I'd like to react about this: at this stage I share Ludovic's feeling. I had
people from outside the project look at the 16 logo and they weren't able to
read "XWiki" in it. I'm afraid that while stylistically interesting, this
logo is too unreadable for mainstream use - unless we don't expect anyone to
understand the XWiki logo that is.
I'm feeling pretty close to giving it a -1 too if its readability isn't
improved. I know I might be going against the flow here but we're about to
make a significant choice here and I don't want us to regret it.
Any thoughts? Guillaume
> Ludovic
>
> Le 12/04/10 16:44, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit :
>
> On 04/12/2010 04:30 PM, Thibaut Camberlin wrote:
>>
>>
>>> My corrected vote is +1 for 12A.
>>>
>>>
>> 12A has been retired and is no longer a valid option. Please choose
>> another one.
>>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/