Re: [xwiki-devs] Improvements proposals for a gallery photo

Hi, Nice mockups. Here are my remarks: * What is the purpose of step4 in the creation wizard (slides 33-34)? 3 steps should be enough in a wizard and the 4th step looks more like "view" mode to me and should be separate from the wizard. * What is the difference between AWM's "Add new entry" button and the "Add album" button on the app's homepage (slides 35-36). Seems to me that they both do the same thing. * Minor details: On slides 37-38, I am guessing you want to show the details of the album "Holidays", but XWiki's UI (URL and breadcrumbs) suggest you are still on the app's homepage. * Things to consider: On a similar note, you should consider XWiki's actions for editing something (e.g. an album) with respect to the UI buttons that are available at the bottom of the screen [1]. All you mockups seem to be in "view" mode, however the create and edit steps for an album entry should be performed in the "edit" (?editor=inline) mode. It`s great that you`re working on this and sharing it with the community. Hope to hear more from you! Thanks, Eduard P.S.: --- Note/suggestions for the future when asking for/receiving people's feedback: I must admit that I have not read all the details in that PDF, I mainly scanned the titles and looked at the mockups. I did not even touch the zip file. You need to consider these things when asking for feedback, since if you give a link, people will expect to find everything on the linked page. In your case I had to find out that the content was attached to the page and not in the page itself (the page was an empty and unattractive "placeholder"). I had to download a pdf and view it, instead of reading a wiki/web page. The zip attachment was just too complicated (download + extract + view in local viewer + etc.). Bottom line is that people's time is precious and, if you want feedback, you have to present it in a way that is easily reviewable. The more complicated you make the process to review (i.e. the less time you spend in preparing the work to be reviewed), the less reviews/feedback you will receive from people that just can`t afford to invest the time. Also, maybe you`ve missed them, but there were a couple of replies [2] to your initial message. Make sure you acknowledge the feedback you get so that you keep people motivated in giving it again the next time :) --- P.P.S.: Hope you take the above suggestions constructively and not as critique. ---------- [1] http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Features/PageEditing#HCommoneditac… [2] http://markmail.org/thread/t6lo7lvqplrbcnfx#query:+page:1+mid:ubhhqlnyxklva… On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Cray xWiki <crayxwiki(a)gmail.com> wrote: