Re: [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Content menus re-organization

On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) &lt;valicac(a)gmail.com Why, this does not look to me like the actual mobile interface works ? > > Thanks, > Caty > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea < > mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Denis Gervalle &lt;dgl(a)softec.lu> > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > Sorry for jumping in late on this one, but has I have probably already > > > mentioned in the issue, I really find inappropriate not to have a > quickly > > > look on whether you are watching the current page or not (no matter if > > you > > > watch it directly or indirectly). So, IMO, the watch icon should show > up > > > outside of the menu, and resume you watch state. It is both a action > and > > a > > > state, and IMO it deserver a better place in the UI. > > > > > > Obviously, if you add that the proposal 1.3, it gonna make a lot of > menu, > > > and I would say too much. > > > > > > > > > > Am I alone concerned by the important of pushing that watch feature in > a > > > better place ? > > > > > > > I agree we should see the "watch" state without any additional clicks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau < > > > gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> > > > > > > Results for now: > > > > > > > > 1.1: -0 (me), -1 (Jean), -1 (Yacine) > > > > 1.2: +1 (me), -0 (Jean), +1 (Caty), +1 (Yacine) > > > > 1.3: 0 (me), +1 (Jean), +0 (Yacine), +1 (Guillaume Lerouge). > > > > > > > > So 1.1 is out. > > > > > > > > We still have 1.2 = 2 (me and Caty are the only binding votes) and > 1.3 > > = > > > 1 > > > > (Jean is only the binding vote). > > > > > > > > It's a bit short to take a decision. Please vote! > > > > > > > > > > > > 2015-10-05 16:18 GMT+02:00 Marius Dumitru Florea < > > > > mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com&gt;gt;: > > > > > > > > > For the record, the users that don't have delete and admin right on > > > > > the current document (i.e. the users that are neither > administrators > > > > > nor the creator of the current document), which is the most common > > use > > > > > case I think, will have only the Copy entry in the Actions menu > with > > > > > 1.2. In other words, most of the users will see a menu with only > one > > > > > entry. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Marius > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau > > > > > &lt;gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > > > > > With 7.2, the content menus have changed a lot. The pain point is > > > that > > > > we > > > > > > have a too much crowded "more actions" menu. > > > > > > > > > > > > Some discussions have already been done on this jira issue: > > > > > > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12587 > > > > > > > > > > > > Caty have created a design page to re-organize the menus: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/NestedMenuReorganization > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm in favor of the solution 1.2. > > > > > > > > > > > > So: > > > > > > > > > > > > * -0 for solution 1.1 since the viewers are not what we use the > > most > > > > > > (thanks to the extra tabs on the bottom) and it gives them too > much > > > > > > importance > > > > > > * +1 for solution 1.2, even if we might encounter some > difficulties > > > > > saying > > > > > > if an item is a base action or an advanced one. > > > > > > > > > > > > * 0 for option A (too much clicks), but on the other hand I don't > > > have > > > > an > > > > > > alternative to propose. > > > > > > * +1 for option B. The jira issue is already created ( > > > > > > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12636) and I think nobody > would > > > be > > > > > > opposed to this. > > > > > > * +0 for option C. The browser already have this ability, and > yes, > > it > > > > > > implies the hiding of the panels (thanks to some CSS we have). > > > > However, I > > > > > > remember a client using this feature for a convoluted use-case: > > > > include a > > > > > > light wiki page in an other website via an iframe. Anyway, we > could > > > > still > > > > > > keep the viewer but remove the link. > > > > > > * +1 for D. I know that security through obscurity is not the > best, > > > but > > > > > it > > > > > > disturbs me to let an access to the source code of any wiki page, > > > > > including > > > > > > not-well-done applications created by users. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Guillaume > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com) > > > > > > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS > > > > > > Committer on the XWiki.org project > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > devs mailing list > > > > > > devs(a)xwiki.org > > > > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > devs mailing list > > > > > devs(a)xwiki.org > > > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com) > > > > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS > > > > Committer on the XWiki.org project > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > devs mailing list > > > > devs(a)xwiki.org > > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Denis Gervalle > > > SOFTEC sa - CEO > > > _______________________________________________ > > > devs mailing list > > > devs(a)xwiki.org > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > devs(a)xwiki.org > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > devs(a)xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO