7 Mar
2011
7 Mar
'11
11:27 a.m.
Le 07/03/11 11:25, Vincent Massol a écrit :
On Mar 7, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
I don't find it a big
change. You just need to document it.
At some point we should make the change so do it
Ludovic
Le 07/03/11 10:46, Vincent Massol a écrit :
That's
why I suggested to only changed web/ and not plugins... :) On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Ludovic Dubost
wrote:
The references to the plugins. They have the full package name in them Le 06/03/11 21:37, Vincent Massol a écrit :
> On Mar 6, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> web modules are the last remaining com.xpn packages ?
> No there are still plugins but for those the best is probably to change the package
when they're replaced by components. I haven't really thought if users would be
impacted by a package change for plugins.
>
You just need to change xwiki.cfg.
what do you need to change in xwiki.cfg? -Vincent
--
Ludovic Dubost
Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
Ludovic
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> If you change, I suggest you change ALL
>>
>> So 0- to change only web
>> +1 to change all to org.xwiki
>>
>> Ludovic
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>>> Jerome.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Vincent Massol<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Since we're starting the 3.0 cycle I think it's time to move
the web modules to use the org.xwiki groupId and package names.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not really normal for an open source project such as our to
use the package of a company (and that of a company that doesn't exist anymore...
xpertnet has been replaced by XWiki SAS a few years ago) and I don't think moving web
modules to that package/groupid is going to cause any important problems to anyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's my +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs