Hi Johannes,
thanks for the detailed remark.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:38, jstoldt <j.stoldt(a)gmx.net> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have been working with the application strings a fair bit lately when
doing the German Translation for XWiki. While doing that I noticed a lot of
the stuff says "OpenOffice". Now, this term is problematic, IMO.
1. "OpenOffice" is trademarked in the Netherlands and UK so the office
suite
opted for "OpenOffice.org", so if we were talking about this particular
office suite, it should actually be "OpenOffice.org".
2. Since Sun was acquired by Oracle there was a major fork which created
LibreOffice. The latter is going to be redistributed with Linux
distributions such as Ubuntu. That means to say that using "OpenOffice" is
kind of pointing to only one product, when more products are available.
What I would like to discuss is if you would like to see a replacement of
this very specific (and at least a little faulty) term and if so, what
should it be? I thought about "Open Office" which is getting a little
further away but I am really not happy with it either. "Open office suite"
would be a little more generic and would include all OOo derivatives with
the downside of including other potential open source office suites that
got
nothing to do with OOo at all (such as GNOME Office).
Any comments on that?
We could also simply go for a generic term such as "backend conversion
module" or "office conversion module", which would obviate the issue
altogether.
Guillaume
Regards,
Johannes
--
View this message in context:
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/Replacing-mentions-of-OpenOffice-tp601553…
Sent from the XWiki- Dev mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs