On 24 Mar 2018, at 21:58, Paul Libbrecht
<paul(a)hoplahup.net> wrote:
Hello Mohammed,
have you googled for paged-media html to css converters?
Surely an option is to let it be done by the browser but there must also be engines.
We have evaluated this in the past and there are lots of limitations, see
https://markmail.org/message/ztcwibiuoqfjcnjo
E.g. I think that phantomJS of weasyprint can do that.
However, I haven’t found yet in java (which would simplify things).
Note that phantomjs is dead now:
https://www.puzzle.ch/blog/articles/2018/02/12/phantomjs-is-dead-long-live-…
As Vincent says, print with LaTeX in the middle is a
way to get high-quality but there are many losses too: it is really hard to get CSS rules
to be all implemented in TeX.
Yes indeed, that’s very hard. CSS shouldn’t be used as a way to style the LaTeX output.
The LaTeX exporter itself should provide its own way of controlling the style of the
output. This is what I do in the LaTeX exporter. Basically I provide some default styles
(sometimes with some config options) and the user has the ability to control exactly the
styles he/she wants applied if the default style is not enough. It’s not trivial though
and will take a bit of time if you need a heavily styled document.
Thanks
-Vincent
I’m wondering if CSSbox could do the job.
paul
On 24 Mar 2018, at 20:51, Mohamed Ashraf wrote:
> Yes this is part of GSOC project
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Mar 24, 2018, at 9:29 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mohamed,
>>
>>> On 24 Mar 2018, at 19:12, Mohamed Ashraf <morybtf(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Currently, the PDF export of XWiki is implemented based on XSL-FO and
>>> transformation of XHTML to FO. This poses a couple of problems, mainly
>>> related to the current level of support of FO from libraries implementing
>>> FO to PDF transformation, as well as the limitations of automatized
>>> transformation of XHTML to FO. The problems are mainly related to styling
>>> limitations, auto-layouting, etc.
>>>
>>> The idea is to try to replace this with a pure XHTML & CSS (paged CSS)
>>> export, using an open source library for producing PDFs out of this
>>> ,
>>
>> Sure, but which one?
>>
>> The only alternative I know is flying saucer (which is dead:
https://github.com/flyingsaucerproject/flyingsaucer). Is that what you mean?
>>
>> Do you know a maintained fork of it? One that I know is used by a competing wiki:
https://bitbucket.org/atlassian/xhtmlrenderer-atlassian
>>
>> Are you doing this as part of this GSOC project:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/GoogleSummerOfCode/ImplementPDFexportwi…
?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>>
>>> and I will see LaTeX ,
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> 2018-03-24 19:52 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>et>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Mohamed,
>>>>
>>>>> On 24 Mar 2018, at 18:44, Mohamed Ashraf <morybtf(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If we should replacing the XSL-FO which we use to export PDF file out
of
>>>>> XML,
>>>>> with XML and CSS only with open-source library ,
>>>>>
>>>>> and I think * ”CSS Paged Media “ *
>>>>>
>>>>> is this good enough to do that ,
>>>>> or there are any suggestion
>>>>
>>>> Sorry but I don’t understand your question. Why would you want toi
replace
>>>> XSL-FO in your XWiki install?
>>>>
>>>> If you’d like to contribute to XWiki dev, then could you provide more
>>>> context and explain why you want to replace XSL-FO and by what.
>>>>
>>>> You may also be interested by the LaTeX exporter which can be used to
>>>> generate PDFs:
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/LaTeX/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Vincent
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>