1 Nov
2010
1 Nov
'10
12:50 p.m.
Hi everyone,
I am +1 to make stabilization work, on a couple of releases
I am +1 to have soon a 3.0 release
And i am +1 on the content vincent propose
But my point of view is -1 stepping the release family number because the main purpose of
what is discussed here is stabilization, and not showing the path of 3.x family.
Therefore :
- do we consider a january 2011 release to be stable enough ?
- stabilization work wouldn'it be leading then to the last 2.x version instead of the
first 3.x family version ?
- is there behind it a consensus on what we will concentrate our effort in 3.x versions ?
I mean thematics we can talk about.
- therefore, are we in a situation where we can vote on the global thematics we will
develop in 3.x releases ?
- do we have a clear consensus short list of features that show the path of 3.x family ?
- in consequence of that, is the release content here send a clear message to uneducated
publics about what is in this future 3.x versions ?
- do educated people care this much about release number, that we absolutely have to
release a 3.0 with the content presented below ?
We have to make 100% sure our message will be understood by market. We are now in the
Gartner magic quadrant and will increase our visibility outside the opensource community.
In a world where new release number families means : "we show the path of the future
of this software, even if the features we present are not perfect", i will strongly
promote to answer in details the questions i mentionned before deciding 2.8 to be in fact
3.0.
Then here is the two elements that are probably the biggest things in the roadmap for 3.x
versions :
- going social (workspaces in xem, twitter like app, page stats for the user, etc.)
- going to be an easy place to develop in (extension manager of course, but also
documentation for dummies and a first app like "app within minute" proposed by
guillaume and strongly needed by our front team)
Is there a consensus on this list ? Then what should be the "demo" features we
could present to be consistent for a 3.0 release ?
Best
On 1 nov. 2010, at 09:23, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Sergiu started mentioning the idea of a XE 3.0 when we defined the XE 2.6 roadmap. We
need a more general agreement that we want a XE 3.0 and how to reach it.
As Sergiu I believe we need a XE 3.0 ASAP for the following reasons:
- it's been a bit more than 1 year since the XE 2.0 release and I feel it's good
to have one major release every year
- we've added **lots** of features since XE 2.0. Check
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ReleaseNotes to get a feeling
- it's good for open source marketing
Before being able to release XE 3.0 I think:
- XE 2.6 is already planned for the 18th of November (with "mail this page" and
"recent activity" features + icon/emoticon and wikiword support that was sneaked
in surreptitiously)
- We should have a XE 2.7 release (1 month duration, ie leading us to the 18th of
December) to finish started stuff:
-- Finish the Gadget integration since it's been started already and it's
important. That said I'd actually be ok to not finish it if we think it's too much
to release XE 3.0 quickly according to the dates below. Anca to tell us if it's
possible in the timeframe.
-- First working extension manager that can be used to install XARs (replaces the old
Packager on the back end side). Thomas to tell us if it's possible in the timeframe.
-- Recent Activity with apps sending events (XE 2.6 will already have a good part of it)
-- UI finishing touches
-- Some additional Security and Performance improvements if possible
-- etc (add what you'd like to see absolutely here - it should be work already
started as much as possible and no new stuff)
- Release XE 3.0 one month after the XE 2.7 release, ie around 18th of January - ie end
of January 2011)
Very important: XE 3.0 should be a maturation/conclusion release, i.e. concluding all the
work started in the 2.x series (same as what we did for XE 2.0). It shouldn't be seen
as revolutionary stuff that we should add from now on since it'll take a year more
before those can be fully stabilized and we would loose the window of opportunity of doing
a major release now.
Note: We shouldn't try to cram too much things in since that'll extend the lead
time to release XE 3.0 and we'll loose the stabilization effect.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs