application-forum-package/
+ pom.xml
+ application-forum/
| + pom.xml
| + src/
+ application-forum-test/
| + pom.xml
| + application-forum-test-pageobjects/
| | + pom.xml
| | + src/
| + application-forum-test-tests/
| | + pom.xml
| | + src/
What do you think? Of course, it doesn't solve the problem of
homogenization of application's names.
On 18/03/2015 19:28, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
Hi,
I want to write automated tests for some contrib applications, but I need
you help on some questions.
== Prb 1. Folder Structure + Changing IDs ==
Currently the majority of applications don't have modules.
Also some applications have IDs that don't correspond with the contrib
standard: sometimes wrong groupId like 'org.xwiki.contrib.forum',
sometimes
random artifactId.
When wanting to change the groupId for 'org.xwiki.contrib.forum' I was
told
that we should change it only if we have a very
good reason, otherwise
changing the ID will resolve in upgrading problems within the Extension
Manager. Unfortunately I don't remember exactly the problem with the
changing of the ID, I just know I don't need to do it :) (//sorry Thomas)
Example:
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-forum
Theoretically, wanting to add tests I would need to create two modules:
- application-forum-test
- application-forum-ui, and move the current sources here.
Unfortunately this means a change in the ID.
Are 'adding tests' a good reason to change the ID?
Should I not change the ID, and just add a test module?
- application-forum-test
- src/main/resources
== Prb 2. Naming standards ==
We have some conventions on
contrib.xwiki.org about name of the project.
We should add maybe some more examples on groupId and artifactId.
Also when looking at the test modules names, some applications have:
- {{full-repository-name}}-tests
- {{full-repository-name}}-test
- {{partial-repository-name}}-test
- {{random-repository-name}}-test
- test
Maybe we should agree also on this and document it.
I guess the correct name would be:
- {{full-repository-name}}-test
-- {{full-repository-name}}-test-pageobjects
-- {{full-repository-name}}-test-tests
- {{full-repository-name}}-ui
Also if we are 'discovering' some applications that don't correspond to
the
standard, do we change them or do we let them be?
Since changing means a
change in the ID :P
Since in theory we should have automated tests for all our applications,
should we add a convention to always create a
- {{full-repository-name}}-ui ?
Additional question: Also when we will transfer from platform to contrib,
are we going to rename the modules?
Thanks,
Caty
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Jean Simard
jean.simard(a)xwiki.com
Research engineer at XWiki SAS
http://www.xwiki.com
Committer on the
XWiki.org project
http://www.xwiki.org
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org