Le 31 janv. 2011 à 19:48, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit :
   The interest
is that it could allow some of the web requests to be served by a database that is a slave
of the main database, in live synchronization with the master MySQL. 
 You mean that the public wiki reads data from the read-only database,
 which is actually updated by cloning another read-write database updated
 from a private wiki? 
 
Actually, the goal is the converse: the internal, robot-oriented xwiki would read the
cloned DB.
  That's an interesting idea for securing a public
server. 
could be though you need a filtering mechanism thn.
  You should also set in xwiki.cfg:
 xwiki.readonly=1 
why *also* ?
  This might reduce some of the errors that you get,
although there's a
 lot of code that ignores this setting. It would be nice if you could
 report (on jira) what exactly breaks so that we can fix it properly. 
If you say a lot of code ignores that than I'd better not rely on it I'm afraid.
Nonetheless, the previous option sounds good.
paul