28 Aug
2007
28 Aug
'07
9:03 a.m.
Hi,
This is not only related to comments but also to tags (also objects)
and maybe also attachments. The behavior you describe here for
comments is taken by confluence and I personally find it more
intuitive -- since it preserves the "forum metaphor" for the comments
(on a forum you can't "revert" what other people say). However it's
very hard to tell what would be best for the users (unless you do a
case study in which you ask 100+ users).
The only question about having it as an option (for each class I
suppose if you want something generic) is how hard it is to implement
and roll-in ?
Catalin
On 8/24/07, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu.dumitriu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
This is more a matter of opinions. Should a comment increase the
version of a document? I'd say yes, but the view of simple users is
that a comment should not affect the document, as it is something
describing the document, not belonging to the document. So we should
have a parameter that configures this.
WDYT?
Sergiu
--
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws