13 Dec
2009
13 Dec
'09
1:43 p.m.
On Dec 13, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Before voting please consider that this will break a
lot of existing
code which is currently using org.xwiki.bridge.DocumentName (since
it would now be named org.xwiki.model.DocumentName).
Do we want to keep org.xwiki.bridge.DocumentName (and all the others
too) and deprecate them?
IMO it depends if we agree that 2.2 will introduce the new model or
not.
WDYT?
hmm I guess we could add them as backward-compat aspects.
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks
-Vincent
On Dec 13, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
New proposal:
Create a new xwiki-model and move "clean" classes from xwiki-bridge
into it. These are:
- *AttachmentName*
- *DocumentName*
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 18:00, Vincent Massol<vincent(a)massol.net>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since we have some final classes (final in the sense with a good
>> architecture) in xwiki-bridge I'd like to rename it into xwiki-
>> model
>> so that we can start this model module.
>>
>> Note: We'd still have a org.xwiki.model.bridge package for the time
>> being in that xwiki-model module.
>>
>> Here's my +1
>
> I would prefer to create a new xwiki-model with only the clean apis
> instead of having clean and bridge in the same project.
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent